Re: [efloraofindia:396901] Identification required for this Euphorbia sp

Hi, Seema ji, Pl. post the same or similar images in the same mail. I think it was posted earlier also (twice). Pl. see feedback in *Euphorbia???- BGSBU RAJOURI J AND K * On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 at 23:57, Seema Bin Zeenat wrote: > Location:

Re: [efloraofindia:396900] Sphaeranthus gomphrenoides, Asteraceae

You are welcome.  On Sun, 5 Sep 2021, 10:26 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks a lot, Milind ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Sat, 4 Sep, 2021, 11:06 pm Milind Girdhari, > wrote: > >> Sir >> Sending here some photographs of Sphaeranthus gomphrenoides, Asteraceae >> recently reported

Re: [efloraofindia:396899] Plant ID

Thank you so much. On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 10:29 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Paradesi ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Fri, 3 Sep, 2021, 8:23 am Paradesi Anjaneyulu, < > paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Indigofera trifoliata, >> With regards. >> >> >> >> [image:

Re: [efloraofindia:396898] Plant ID

Thanks, Paradesi ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Fri, 3 Sep, 2021, 8:23 am Paradesi Anjaneyulu, < paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > Indigofera trifoliata, > With regards. > > > > [image: Mailtrack] > >

Re: [efloraofindia:396897] Sphaeranthus gomphrenoides, Asteraceae

Thanks a lot, Milind ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat, 4 Sep, 2021, 11:06 pm Milind Girdhari, wrote: > Sir > Sending here some photographs of Sphaeranthus gomphrenoides, Asteraceae > recently reported from Pune MH .This is a new record to Asia > > -- > You received this message because

Re: [efloraofindia:396896] Re: Flora of Kaiga ID_Please_04092021PK1

Thanks, Radha ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat, 4 Sep, 2021, 8:04 pm radha veach, wrote: > Ficus amplissima to me > > Regards > Radha > > On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 6:16:39 AM UTC-6 Mahadeswara wrote: > >> Ficus virens ??? >> >> On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 12:17:29 PM

Re: [efloraofindia:396895] Re: Flora of Kaiga ID_Please_04092021PK1

Thanks, Mahadeswara ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat, 4 Sep, 2021, 5:46 pm Mahadeswara, wrote: > Ficus virens ??? > > On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 12:17:29 PM UTC+5:30 K PUTTARAJU wrote: > >> >> >> >> Original Message >> >>

[efloraofindia:396895] Re: Flora of Kaiga ID_Please_04092021PK1

https://indiabiodiversity.org/species/show/11881 Pl check both links. On Sunday, September 5, 2021 at 9:43:13 AM UTC+5:30 Mahadeswara wrote: > https://indiabiodiversity.org/species/show/31361 > > On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 8:04:27 PM UTC+5:30 radha veach wrote: > >> Ficus amplissima to me

[efloraofindia:396894] Re: Flora of Kaiga ID_Please_04092021PK1

https://indiabiodiversity.org/species/show/31361 On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 8:04:27 PM UTC+5:30 radha veach wrote: > Ficus amplissima to me > > Regards > Radha > > On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 6:16:39 AM UTC-6 Mahadeswara wrote: > >> Ficus virens ??? >> >> On Saturday, September 4,

Re: [efloraofindia:396888] Re: Another wild shrub for id_ Hyderabad

Thanks, Lalithamba ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Sat, 4 Sep, 2021, 7:24 pm Lalithamba Avadhanam, wrote: > FPM Gamble,(for pallida) > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 5:19 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Lalithamba ji. >> Which source? >> Also description in Flora of Bombay Presidency say

Re: [efloraofindia:396887] Hooghly yesterday : Cyperus esculentus L. ?

Many thanks to Prasad ji and thank you for taking care, Garg Sir. Regards surajit On Sat, 4 Sept 2021 at 07:21, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Prasad ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: PRASAD V.P. <> > Date: Sat, 4 Sep, 2021, 6:32 am >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:396886] I'd requested for this plant

Thanks, Sunoj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Sunojkumar P <> Date: Sat, 4 Sep, 2021, 8:31 pm Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:396627] I'd requested for this plant To: J.M. Garg Most probably it is L. lanata sunoj On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 2:37 PM J.M.

[efloraofindia:396884] Re: 136 ID wild plant

Yes, it is, dear Paradesi ji, thank you very much for ID my plant, with kind regards, Sam. On Sat, 4 Sep 2021, 6:39 pm Sam Kuzhalanattu, wrote: > Sharing more images > > On Sat, 4 Sep 2021, 6:36 pm Sam Kuzhalanattu, > wrote: > >> It is Clerodendrum sp.? Sharing more image >> >> On Sat, 4 Sep

Re: [efloraofindia:396883] Wild Plant For ID : California : 20NOV14 : AK-46

Resurfacing for validation. Would the correct name be Camissonia cheiranthifolia or Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia ssp. cheiranthifolia for my plant? Experts kindly advice. Aarti On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:47 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please. > >

Re: [efloraofindia:396882] Re: 136 ID wild plant Clerodendrum

Clerodendrum infortunatum, With regards. [image: image.gif] [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 09/04/21,

[efloraofindia:396882] Re: Flora of Kaiga ID_Please_04092021PK1

Ficus amplissima to me Regards Radha On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 6:16:39 AM UTC-6 Mahadeswara wrote: > Ficus virens ??? > > On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 12:17:29 PM UTC+5:30 K PUTTARAJU wrote: > >> >> >> >> Original Message >>

Re: [efloraofindia:396876] Solanaceae Fortnight: Solanum pseudocapsicum?? at Mizoram : PKA-FEB25/25:

This is female plant of Baliospermum calycinum var. calycinum. On Sat, Sep 4, 2021, 17:15 J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Shiny ji. > To me it looks different from images at *Baliospermum solanifolium* (Burm.) > Suresh >

[efloraofindia:396876] Re: Flora of Kaiga ID_Please_04092021PK1

Ficus virens ??? On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 12:17:29 PM UTC+5:30 K PUTTARAJU wrote: > > > > Original Message > Subject: Flora of Kaiga ID_Please_04092021PK1 > From: "K PUTTARAJU" > Date: Sat, September 4, 2021 12:14 pm > To: >

Re: [efloraofindia:396874] Re: Another wild shrub for id_ Hyderabad

Thanks, Lalithamba ji. Which source? Also description in Flora of Bombay Presidency say differently as available at Cissus woodrowii On Sat, 4 Sept 2021 at 16:52, Lalithamba Avadhanam wrote: > C.woodrowii is climbing; and glaucous,

Re: [efloraofindia:396872] Efloraofindia website updated up to 31st August’21- More than 14,000 species

KUDOS Garg Ji, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 09/04/21, 04:38:06 PM On Sat, 4 Sept 2021 at

Re: [efloraofindia:396871] Re: Another wild shrub for id_ Hyderabad

As per the keys in Flora of Eastern Karnataka , as it does not have any tendrils, it should be *Cissus woodrowii*. However, it also states under description of *C.woodrowii*

Re: [efloraofindia:396870] Re: Another wild shrub for id_ Hyderabad

Catalogue of Life gives *Cissus pallida* Steud. as a syn. of *Cissus adnata *Roxb., while POWO

Re: [efloraofindia:396868] Re: 128 ID wild plant Zingiberaceae

Hi, Sabu ji, I am not finding any reference or publication on the net giving the* Zingiber cernum* as a syn. of *Zingiber nimmonii*. May I request you to pl. clarify in the matter or give the reference pl. On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 06:34, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Sabu ji > > -- > With

Re: [efloraofindia:396867] I'd requested 1vc

Any other images, Shakir ji? On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 07:34, Shakir Ahmad (Amateur Taxonomist) < saadikshakir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you sir!! > > On Wed, 1 Sep, 2021, 7:09 am Paradesi Anjaneyulu, < > paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Check with Rhamnaceae Ahmad JI, >> With regards.

[efloraofindia:396866] Efloraofindia website updated up to 31st August’21- More than 14,000 species

It’s heartening to reiterate that *Efloraofindia* * is the largest google e-group/ forum in the world *in this field & the largest nature related e-group (and the most constructive) in India with around 3,96,800 messages so far &

Re: [efloraofindia:396860] Identification required for Berberis sp. From kashmir.

On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 at 15:19, J.M. Garg wrote: > Location:Kupwara jammu and kashmir. > Hi, Shakir ji, > Pl. post detailed images for proper id. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Shakir Ahmad (Amateur Taxonomist) > Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 14:59 > Subject:

Re: [efloraofindia:396856] Fwd: 17/06/2013 ASP 59

Same as in HALDU 3 A & B 2014/12/20 On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 at 10:57, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Erythroxylum monogynum ? >