[efloraofindia:432971] Re: SK 3638 18 September 2022

Yes, appears close as per images and references at Lonicera ligustrina On Sun, 18 Sept 2022 at 21:45, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > *Lonicera ligustrina *Wall. ?? > https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/lRtOe5zyuMQ/m/EeS02AIfBgAJ ?? > >

[efloraofindia:432970] Re: Odontochilus lanceolatus (Lindl.) Blume

Thank you Dr. Kumar. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 at 3:58 am, Pankaj Kumar wrote: > Very pretty!!! > Thanks for sharing. > Pankaj > > On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 23:03, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Yes, appears close to images at GBIF >> >>

[efloraofindia:432969] Re: Odontochilus lanceolatus (Lindl.) Blume

Very pretty!!! Thanks for sharing. Pankaj On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 23:03, J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, appears close to images at GBIF > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 22:14 >

[efloraofindia:432968] Re: SK 3637 17 September 2022

Pl. check Vigna nepalensis as per https://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/databases-plant_images_detail_en.php?plno=5420610037 On Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 21:22, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Members, > > Location: Godam, Chandragiri, Lalitpur > Date: 16 September 2022 > Altitude: 1768m. > Habitat : Wild > Image

Re: [efloraofindia:432967] Re: SK 2436 06 February 2020

Finally !!! Thank you Radha Ji! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 8:36 PM radha veach wrote: > Glad to hear it. Thank you Saroj ji! > > Regards > Radha > > On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 3:33:21 AM UTC-6 Saroj Kumar Kasaju > wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On

Re: [efloraofindia:432966] Ceropegia from Meghalaya

Very different compared to the sp. found in Nepal. Thank you Sushant Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 8:39 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Sushant ji > > On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 20:23, Sushant More > wrote: > >> Ceropegia pubescence it is >> >> On Wed, 21 Sep, 2022, 8:21 pm J.M.

[efloraofindia:432965] Re: Odontochilus lanceolatus (Lindl.) Blume

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 8:48 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, appears close to images at GBIF > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Saroj Kasaju > Date: Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 22:14 >

Re: [efloraofindia:432963] Ceropegia from Meghalaya

Thanks, Sushant ji On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 20:23, Sushant More wrote: > Ceropegia pubescence it is > > On Wed, 21 Sep, 2022, 8:21 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Thanks, Noam ji. >> Pl. check with comparative images at Ceropegia >> >> >> >>

Re: [efloraofindia:432962] Re: SK 2436 06 February 2020

Glad to hear it. Thank you Saroj ji! Regards Radha On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 3:33:21 AM UTC-6 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 3:17 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at

[efloraofindia:432961] Re: Ceropegia from Meghalaya

Wild, Meghalaya, 19.9.2022 I have no other details. On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 4:39:53 PM UTC+2 Noam Bar-Shai wrote: > Hello, Does anybody recognize this Ceropegia from Meghalaya? > Regards! > Noam Bar-Shai > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [efloraofindia:432958] MS,Sept.,2022/07 Marsdenia sp. ? for id.

I guess you are right Mr. Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 12:33 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I checked the species listed in the Assam area as per details at Marsdenia > . > > To me it appears close to *Marsdenia roylei* Wight >

[efloraofindia:432957] Re: SK 2940 05 August 2021

*Trachelospermum lucidum *(D.Don) Schum. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 1:28 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > This should be *Ficus hederacea* Roxb. > > Kind regards, > Varun > > On Sat, 21 Aug 2021 at 17:04, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Ficus? >> >> -- Forwarded message -

Re: [efloraofindia:432953] Tree identification request

Thankyou Garg ji, Suneel ji. I was confused because of the size of the leaf, but maybe because these are new growth. This group has been tremendous support for me. Thank you everyone for helping new researchers like me. Regards, Sonali On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 11:03 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > I

Re: [efloraofindia:432952] Re: Ahmedabad - Sept 20th 2022- DS-02

Four O' clock plant..ornamental shrub. Thanks & Regards.prof. suneel On Wed, 21 Sep 2022, 6:52 am Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Thank you Paradesi ji ! > Saroj Kasaju > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 at 11:32 pm, Paradesi Anjaneyulu < > paradesianjiney...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes Saroj JI, >> With

Re: [efloraofindia:432950] Mulshi near Pune, Maharashtra, June 2022 :: Eriolaena quinquelocularis :: ARK2022-103

To me also appears close to images at Eriolaena quinquelocularis On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 13:17, Alka Khare wrote: > Thanks Garg ji and Mahadeswara ji. > > Regards > Alka Khare > > On Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 9:37:29 AM

Re: [efloraofindia:432950] Mulshi near Pune, Maharashtra, June 2022 :: Eriolaena quinquelocularis :: ARK2022-103

Thanks Garg ji and Mahadeswara ji. Regards Alka Khare On Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 9:37:29 AM UTC+5:30 Mahadeswara wrote: > It is called Kondigida in kannada. > > On Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 9:36:58 AM UTC+5:30 Mahadeswara wrote: > >> By the by superb catch !!! >> >> On Saturday,

Re: [efloraofindia:432949] Devgad, Konkan, May 2022 :: Crinum latifolium :: ARK2022-101

Thanks Mahadeswara ji and Garg ji. Regards Alka Khare On Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 9:38:53 AM UTC+5:30 Mahadeswara wrote: > Awesome images ! > > On Saturday, September 17, 2022 at 6:53:24 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Alka ji, for wonderful images. >> -- >> With regards, >> J.

Re: [efloraofindia:432948] Mulshi near Pune, Maharashtra, June 2022 :: Pavetta crassicaulis for validation:: ARK2022-104

Thanks Garg ji for validating. Regards Alka Khare On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 12:29:06 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Yes, appears close to images at Pavetta crassicaulis > > > On Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 07:05, J.M. Garg wrote: >

Re: [efloraofindia:432947] France, July 2022 :: Pine for ID :: ARK2022-093

Thank you Garg ji. I too was thinking on the same lines. Regards Alka Khare On Monday, September 5, 2022 at 2:57:07 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > I think appears more closer to marking on young cones of Pinus halepensis > at > https://www.euforgen.org/species/pinus-halepensis/ > >

Re: [efloraofindia:432945] Mulshi near Pune, Maharashtra, June 2022 :: Pavetta crassicaulis for validation:: ARK2022-104

Yes, appears close to images at Pavetta crassicaulis On Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 07:05, J.M. Garg wrote: > Beautiful images. > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Fri, 16 Sep, 2022, 10:31 pm Alka Khare, wrote: > >> Hello friends >> >>

[efloraofindia:432944] Fwd: Garcinia pedunculata or something else

Thanks a lot, Mohanan ji -- Forwarded message - From: Mohanan Narayanan Nair Date: Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 11:41 Subject: Re: Garcinia pedunculata or something else To: J.M. Garg This species is probably G. xanthochymus only. On Tue, 20 Sep, 2022, 10:49 am J.M. Garg, wrote: >

[efloraofindia:432942] Fwd: Garcinia pedunculata or something else

Thanks a lot, Mohanan ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Mohanan Narayanan Nair <> Date: Wed, 21 Sep, 2022, 11:41 am Subject: Re: Garcinia pedunculata or something else To: J.M. Garg This species is probably G. xanthochymus only. On Tue, 20 Sep,

Re: [efloraofindia:432941] Re: IDentification request for Asteraceae member

Dear. Sir J.M Garg,I checked with the species you guided. However, it looks different. Can it be some Lactuca spp?Many thanksIram On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 12:33:34 PM GMT+5, J.M. Garg wrote: Pl. check Cyanthillium cinereum (L.) H.Rob. On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 17:19, J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:432941] Re: France, July 2022 :: Tree for ID :: ARK2022-098

Yes Garg ji, It does resemble Staphylea colchica but cannot be conclusively decided. Regards Alka Khare On Monday, September 5, 2022 at 3:18:44 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Pl. check Staphylea colchica as per > https://treesandshrubsonline.org/articles/staphylea/staphylea-colchica/ >

Re: [efloraofindia:432940] France, July 2022 :: Succulent for ID :: ARK2022-086

Thanks Garg ji for providing the links. But I could not discern any differences in D. floribundum and D. hispidum. Regards Alka Khare On Monday, September 5, 2022 at 11:28:04 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Any feedback, Alka ji ? > > On Fri, 2 Sept 2022 at 12:08, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Pl. check