Re: [efloraofindia:435326] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Astragalus strictus for validation :: ARK2022-172

The first set could be *Oxytropis* *microphylla* (Pall.) DC. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:51 PM Alka Khare wrote: > Another set a couple of steps away > > On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 12:35:21 PM UTC+5:30 Alka Khare wrote: > >> Hello friends >> >> This was en route

Re: [efloraofindia:435327] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Astragalus strictus for validation :: ARK2022-172

Yes, I also agree as per images at *Oxytropis microphylla* (Pall.) DC. for 1st set. On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 13:39, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > The first set could be *Oxytropis* *microphylla* (Pall.) DC. ?? > Thank you

Re: [efloraofindia:435327] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Astragalus strictus for validation :: ARK2022-172

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 2:03 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, I also agree as per images at *Oxytropis microphylla* (Pall.) DC. > > for > 1st set. > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 13:39,

Re: [efloraofindia:435329] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Leontopodium for validation :: ARK2022-170

*Leontopodium nanum *(Hook.fil. & Thomson) Hand.-Mazz. ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:43 PM Alka Khare wrote: > Hello friends > > This was en route Chang la from Pangong tso, Ladakh in August 2022. > > I think this is Leontopodium nanum. Requested to please validate > >

Re: [efloraofindia:435330] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Arenaria bryophylla :: ARK2022-169

Yes ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:40 PM Alka Khare wrote: > One more > > On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 12:25:00 PM UTC+5:30 Alka Khare wrote: > >> Hello friends >> >> This was en route Chang la from Pangong tso, Ladakh in August 2022. >> >> The entire route was green.

[efloraofindia:435331] Re: SK 3642 24 September 2022

This has been identified as *Cirsium wallichii *var. *nepalensis *(DC.) Karthik. & Moorthy by Prof. Y.S. Chen, South China Botanical Garden. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 2:35 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Low res. images. > Difficult to check the details. > > On Wed, 28 Sept 2022

[efloraofindia:435332] Re: Cirsium phulchokiense Kitam.

This has been identified as *Cirsium wallichii *var. *nepalensis *(DC.) Karthik. & Moorthy by Prof. Y.S. Chen, South China Botanical Garden. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:27 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Actually this has been suggested by a friend ! > > Thank you. > > Saroj

[efloraofindia:435331] Re: SK 2871 18 February 2021

This has been identified as *Cirsium wallichii *var. *nepalensis *(DC.) Karthik. & Moorthy by Prof. Y.S. Chen, South China Botanical Garden. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 9:20 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > That was my guess Mr. Garg but Some friend opined it is not. But I > sti

Re: [efloraofindia:435335] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Potentilla (?) for ID :: ARK2022-171

This single image may be of *Sibbaldianthe bifurca* subsp. *orientalis* (Juz.) Kurtto & T.Erikss. Pl. check. On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 12:31, Alka Khare wrote: > There was one more pic that was taken in the same 5 metre area but about 5 > m

Re: [efloraofindia:435336] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Potentilla (?) for ID :: ARK2022-171

1st set of two images may be of *Potentilla pamirica* Th.Wolf Pl. check. On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 12:30, Alka Khare wrote: > Hello friends > > This was en route Chang la from Pangong tso, Ladakh in August 2022. > > Requested to please ID

Re: [efloraofindia:435337] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Leontopodium for validation :: ARK2022-170

I think it looks different as per keys in Flora of Pakistan . Pl. check with images at *Leontopodium ochroleucum* Beauverd

Re: [efloraofindia:435338] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Arenaria bryophylla :: ARK2022-169

Yes, as per images at Arenaria bryophylla On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 13:55, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Yes ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:40 PM Alka Khare wrote: > >> One more >> >> On Tuesday, October 25, 2022

Re: [efloraofindia:435338] Seeking confirmation ID

Respected sir , Thank you for ID confirmation of Antidesma montanum and Premna esculenta. I'm very much grateful . Thanking you Yours faithfully On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 at 06:40, J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, maybe as per images at > https://efloraofindia.com/species/m---z/p/phyllanthaceae/a

[efloraofindia:435340] Re: SK 2871 18 February 2021

Maybe. Description of *Cirsium phulchokiense * Kitam. along with that of *Cirsium wallichii *var. *nepalensis *(DC.) Karthik. & Moorthy may be of help. Also see GBIF specimens

[efloraofindia:435340] Re: SK 3642 24 September 2022

Maybe. Description of *Cirsium phulchokiense * Kitam. along with that of *Cirsium wallichii *var. *nepalensis *(DC.) Karthik. & Moorthy may be of help. Also see GBIF specimens

[efloraofindia:435343] Re: SK 2871 18 February 2021

Yes I have checked that earlier ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 4:21 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Maybe. Description of *Cirsium phulchokiense * > Kitam. > along > with that of *Cirsium

[efloraofindia:435344] Re: Synotis triligulata (Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don) C.Jeffrey & Y.L.Chen

Ok, I agree as the image is by Stainton, John David Adam On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 14:41, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Please compare fifth image of this link > https://www.gbif.org/species/5402666 with > my image . > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 10:18 PM J.M. Garg wrote: >

[efloraofindia:435345] Re: Synotis triligulata (Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don) C.Jeffrey & Y.L.Chen

Thank you Mr. Garg. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 4:57 pm, J.M. Garg wrote: > Ok, I agree as the image is by Stainton, John David Adam > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 14:41, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Please compare fifth image of this link >> https://www.gbif.org/species/5402666 with >> my imag

Re: [efloraofindia:435347] Identification confirmation

The mentioned species does not have distribution in the area as per POWO . On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 16:13, Tsethup Tshering wrote: > Hello experts, > Kindly help in Id confirmation for this plant which commonly occurs in > chir

Re: [efloraofindia:435349] Identification confirmation

Litsea. On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, 17:24 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Maybe some Litsea species. > Pl. check. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Tsethup Tshering > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 16:13 > Subject: [efloraofindia:435342] Identification co

Fwd: [efloraofindia:435349] MS March, 2020/02 Senecio sp. for ID

Thanks, Sawmliana ji. So it should be Can it be Synotis lushaensis (C.E.C.Fisch.) C.Jeffrey & Y.L.Chen, as all flowers are tubular. -- Forwarded message - From: M Sawmliana Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 17:02 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:344812] MS March, 2020/02 Senecio sp. for ID To:

Re: [efloraofindia:435364] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Potentilla (?) for ID :: ARK2022-171

Thank you Garg ji for the IDs. The single image does look similar to that of Sibbaldianthe bifurca subsp. orientalis. The other 2 resemble P. pamirica. Regards Alka Khare On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 3:08:48 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > 1st set of two images may be of *Potentilla pamirica*

Re: [efloraofindia:435366] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Arenaria bryophylla :: ARK2022-169

Thank you Garg ji and Saroj ji. Regards Alka Khare On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 3:45:52 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Yes, as per images at Arenaria bryophylla > > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 13:55, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Yes ! >> Th

Re: [efloraofindia:435367] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Potentilla (?) for ID :: ARK2022-161

Thanks Garg ji I thought, although the leaves are not as 'hairy' as P. pamirica, they did not match completely with P. multifida. Regards Alka Khare On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 2:27:42 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > I think it is more close to the images at Potentilla multifida >

Re: [efloraofindia:435367] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Leontopodium for validation :: ARK2022-170

Wonderful images, Alka ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 25 Oct, 2022, 6:52 pm Alka Khare, wrote: > Thanks Garg ji. > There was another set right next to these, but which looked different and > hence I thought them to be a different species. > Posting them now for comparison or reference >

Re: [efloraofindia:435368] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Potentilla (?) for ID :: ARK2022-161

P. multifida is quite variable depending upon the elevation and growing conditions. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 25 Oct, 2022, 7:13 pm Alka Khare, wrote: > Thanks Garg ji > > I thought, although the leaves are not as 'hairy' as P. pamirica, they did > not match completely with P. multifid

[efloraofindia:435368] Re: Galinsoga parviflora Cavanilles

Wonderful details. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 25 Oct, 2022, 5:59 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Dear Members, > > Location: GYaneswor, Kathmandu > Date: 25 October 2022 > Elevation: 1400m. > Habitat: Wild > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > -- You received this message because you are subscr

[efloraofindia:435370] Re: Poa annua L.

Thanks, Saroj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Tue, 25 Oct, 2022, 6:31 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Dear Members, > > Location: Gyaneswor, Kathmandu > Date: 25 October 2022 > Elevation: 1400m. > Habitat: Wild > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > -- You received this message because you are subscrib

Re: [efloraofindia:435371] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Leontopodium for validation :: ARK2022-170

The second set looks *Leontopodium* *ochroleucum* Beauverd ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:34 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Wonderful images, Alka ji > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Tue, 25 Oct, 2022, 6:52 pm Alka Khare, wrote: > >> Thanks Garg ji. >> There was another se

[efloraofindia:435372] Re: Galinsoga parviflora Cavanilles

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 8:01 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Wonderful details. > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Tue, 25 Oct, 2022, 5:59 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > >> Dear Members, >> >> Location: GYaneswor, Kathmandu >> Date: 25 October 2022 >> Elevation: 1400m

Re: [efloraofindia:435372] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Arenaria bryophylla :: ARK2022-169

Thank you Alka Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:07 PM Alka Khare wrote: > Thank you Garg ji and Saroj ji. > > Regards > Alka Khare > > On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 3:45:52 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > >> Yes, as per images at Arenaria bryophylla >>

Re: [efloraofindia:435375] Names of Plants in India :: Euphorbia neriifolia L.

Names compiled / updated at https://dineshvalke.blogspot.com/2022/10/euphorbia-neriifolia-l.html Regards. Dinesh On Friday, 15 February 2013 at 20:16:12 UTC+5:30 Dinesh Valke wrote: > I agree Gurcharan ji. Many thanks Gurumurthi ji. > The crux of this particular post is just putting names of th

Re: [efloraofindia:435378] Re: Ladakh, August 2022 :: Arenaria bryophylla :: ARK2022-169

Yes Alka ji, excellent capture. Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 8:39 PM Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Alka

Re: [efloraofindia:435379] Ladakh, August 2022 :: Potentilla (?) for ID :: ARK2022-161

Yes P. multifida appears likely ID Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. https://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:46 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > P. multifida is q

[efloraofindia:435381] Re: Poa annua L.

Yes. It is common here. On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 6:31:54 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Dear Members, > > Location: Gyaneswor, Kathmandu > Date: 25 October 2022 > Elevation: 1400m. > Habitat: Wild > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > -- You received this message because you are s

Re: [efloraofindia:435382] Re: Identification request 13

Please follow up with flowers" photos once they bloom., On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 11:48:12 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks, Mahadeswara ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Tue, 25 Oct, 2022, 9:34 am Mahadeswara, wrote: > >> Leaves resemble *Santalum album* leaves. >> >> On

Re: [efloraofindia:435383] Identification confirmation

Thank all for response. I have crosscheck with the Litsea sp which we have in Bhutan Flora list but does not match to any of the the Listea. Can i have List of Litsea species for India, nepal, China and others. Sometime it look like Neolitsea pallens any comment. Thanking you On Tuesday,

Re: [efloraofindia:435384] Re: Identification request 13

Yes, appears close to images at Santalum album On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 11:47, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Mahadeswara ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Tue, 25 Oct, 2022, 9:34 am Mahadeswara, wrote: > >> Leaves resemble *Santalum

Re: [efloraofindia:435385] Identification confirmation

Looks different from images at Neolitsea pallens For list of species, pl. check at Litsea On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 09:37, Tsethup Tshering wrote: > Thank all for response. > I have crosscheck

Re: [efloraofindia:435386] Fwd: Sterculia sps

POWO does not give its distribution. Also could not find its reporting in India. Fruits and flowers in the 1st two images look different. Are there two sets of trees? On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 09:39, M Swamy wrote: > > Swamy/New

Re: [efloraofindia:435390] Re: Poa annua L.

Thank you Mahadeswara Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 9:41 AM Mahadeswara wrote: > Yes. It is common here. > > On Tuesday, October 25, 2022 at 6:31:54 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju > wrote: > >> Dear Members, >> >> Location: Gyaneswor, Kathmandu >> Date: 25 October 2022 >> Elevation

Re: [efloraofindia:435392] Fwd: Sterculia sps

Fruit image in particular look doubtful. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Wed, 26 Oct, 2022, 12:07 pm M Swamy, wrote: > Thanks Garg ji for your quick response. Yes. I also checked. You are > correct. > I will check with the sender and get back to you as soon as possible > regarding the pictures p

Re: [efloraofindia:435393] I d please - shillong oct 2022

Pl. post details of flowers as details can not be seen in this image. -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Wed, 26 Oct, 2022, 12:03 pm nishan...@gmail.com, wrote: > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "eFloraofIndia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [efloraofindia:435394] Identification confirmation

Thank you sir, I will check the list of Litsea. But what would be your idea on Species Thanking you la On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 10:50, J.M. Garg wrote: > Looks different from images at Neolitsea pallens > > For list of species, pl. check a