Re: [efloraofindia:458813] ID of this Balsam species

Images are not so clear ! Could be drepanophora ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:24 AM subhasis roy wrote: > Thank you for your reply sir. But I have seen Impatiens resemosa, which > has a hood-like upper petal. Actually I was confused between Impatiens > stenantha and

Re: [efloraofindia:458812] ID of this Balsam species

Thank you for your reply sir. But I have seen Impatiens resemosa, which has a hood-like upper petal. Actually I was confused between Impatiens stenantha and Impatiens drepanophora, which I thought it may be, though I am not sure about these two. Please review your id sir. Regards, Subhasi Roy On

Re: Re: [efloraofindia:458811] SK608 01 JUL-2017:ID

Thank you Manoj Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:48 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Manoj ji > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Wed, 29 Nov, 2023, 22:23 manoj chandran, wrote: > >> Kindly correct the id as Poa pratensis (instead of Poa pratensis var. >> poophagorum) >> >> >>

Fwd: [efloraofindia:458810] Re: Reposting grass for ID -4

-- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: manoj chandran Date: Wed, 29 Nov, 2023, 22:32 Subject: [efloraofindia:458808] Re: Reposting grass for ID -4 To: eFloraofIndia Dear all, I am currently working in detail on Poas and have identified the original Poa

Re: Re: [efloraofindia:458808] SK608 01 JUL-2017:ID

Thanks, Manoj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Wed, 29 Nov, 2023, 22:23 manoj chandran, wrote: > Kindly correct the id as Poa pratensis (instead of Poa pratensis var. > poophagorum) > > > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 9:17:49 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Manoj ji. >> >> --

[efloraofindia:458808] Re: Reposting grass for ID -4

Dear all, I am currently working in detail on Poas and have identified the original Poa pseudamoena from Pithoragarh and hence regret to inform that the Poa in this post is not Poa pseudamoena as I had suggested earlier. Kindly post the details of dissected spikelet if the collection is still

Re: Re: [efloraofindia:458807] SK608 01 JUL-2017:ID

Kindly correct the id as Poa pratensis (instead of Poa pratensis var. poophagorum) On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 9:17:49 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks, Manoj ji. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: "Manoj Chandran" <> > Date: 22-Aug-2017 8:26 PM > Subject: Re:

[efloraofindia:458805] Re: Identification request 003

I agree with Anoop ji. I have not observed any prickle. It is very similar to Enterolobium ? https://efloraofindia.com/category/species/a-l-d0/f/fabaceae/enterolobium/ On Sun, Nov 26, 2023, 12:03 J.M. Garg wrote: > > From Anoop ji at (https://efloraofindia.com/2023/09/22/senegalia-torta/):

[efloraofindia:458801] Fwd: SK 3892 13 November 2023 - Moss

Thanks a lot, Pamela ji -- Forwarded message - From: Pamela Saha Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 14:02 Subject: Re: SK 3892 13 November 2023 - Moss To: J.M. Garg Sir This is Thuidium dp With regard Pamela On Wed, 29 Nov, 2023, 1:44 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > Forwarding again for Id

Re: [efloraofindia:458800] Azelea and lavender

Thank you all for the clarification. On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:48 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Mahadeswara ji > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 09:51, Mahadeswara wrote: > >> In my view it is difficult. They are grown generally in hilly places >> like Ooty & Kodai in Tamil Nadu. >> >> On

Re: [efloraofindia:458785] Re: Plant for ID

I think more closer to images at https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/16/neanotis-lancifolia/ On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 10:37, Tabish wrote: > Looks like this one: > http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Montholon's%20Starviolet.html > Tabish > > On Sunday, November 12, 2023 at 10:12:17 AM