[efloraofindia:461785] Re: Phyllanthaceae: Phyllanthus polyphyllus B.Heyne ex Wall.

Emblica racemosa, previously Phyllanthus racemosus. On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 11:44 J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me appears closer to *Phyllanthus racemosus *L.f. (syn. *Phyllanthus > polyphyllus *Willd.): > https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:354558-1 > https://efloraofindia.com/2011

[efloraofindia:461786] Re: Poaceae: Tragus racemosus (L.) All.

Correct wording should be: It does not have distribution in India as per POWO . Can it be *Tragus mongolorum* Ohwi: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:424420-1 https://efloraofindia.com/2011/04/03/tragus-r

[efloraofindia:461786] Re: Phyllanthaceae: Glochidion zeylanicum (Gaertn.) A.Juss.

Glochidion hohenackeri. On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 11:29 J.M. Garg, wrote: > To me looks different from images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/02/glochidion-zeylanicum/ > Can it be > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/02/glochidion-ellipticum/? > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J

[efloraofindia:461788] Re: Phyllanthaceae: Phyllanthus polyphyllus B.Heyne ex Wall.

Thanks a lot, Tapas ji On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 14:49, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > Emblica racemosa, previously Phyllanthus racemosus. > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 11:44 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> To me appears closer to *Phyllanthus racemosus *L.f. (syn. *Phyllanthus >> polyphyllus *Willd.): >> https://pow

[efloraofindia:461788] Re: Phyllanthaceae: Glochidion zeylanicum (Gaertn.) A.Juss.

Thanks a lot, Tapas ji On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 14:50, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > Glochidion hohenackeri. > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 11:29 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> To me looks different from images at >> https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/02/glochidion-zeylanicum/ >> Can it be >> https://efloraofindia.c

[efloraofindia:461790] Re: Polygalaceae: Polygala glomerata Lour.

Looks different from https://efloraofindia.com/2012/03/09/polygala-chinensis/ https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:691242-1 It is https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/23/polygala-javana/ https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:691649-1 On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 1

[efloraofindia:461791] Re: Rhamnaceae: Ventilago madraspatana Gaertn.

This is also https://efloraofindia.com/2013/01/16/ventilago-denticulata/ Looks different from https://efloraofindia.com/2011/04/05/ventilago-maderaspatana/ On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 12:23, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, John ji. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: John Parrotta >

[efloraofindia:461792] Re: Rhamnaceae: Ventilago madraspatana Gaertn.

Also see https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:719143-1 https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:719117-1 On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 16:30, J.M. Garg wrote: > This is also > https://efloraofindia.com/2013/01/16/ventilago-denticulata/ > Looks different from > htt

Re: [efloraofindia:461793] Ligustrum For ID : Lalbagh,Bangalore : 09DEC14 : AK-30

Thanks a lot Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 12:32 J.M. Garg, wrote: > I think it may be *Ligustrum gamblei* Ramamoorthy due to leaf size, shape > and apex as per differences given in their descriptions at Biotik 1 > (

Re: [efloraofindia:461793] Tree for ID : Lalbagh,Bangalore : 181012 : AK-2

Thanks a lot Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 12:35 J.M. Garg, wrote: > I think it may be *Ligustrum gamblei* Ramamoorthy due to leaf size, shape > and apex as per differences given in their descriptions at Biotik 1 > (

Re: [efloraofindia:461793] Tree For ID : Lalbagh,Bangalore : 17SEP14 : AK-20

Thanks a lot Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 12:36 J.M. Garg, wrote: > I think it may be *Ligustrum gamblei* Ramamoorthy due to leaf size, shape > and apex as per differences given in their descriptions at Biotik 1 > (

Fwd: [itpmods:18190] Fwd: [efloraofindia:461796] Bulbophyllum gopalianum from Mizoram

-- Forwarded message - From: Anil Thakur Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 17:29 Subject: Re: [itpmods:18190] Fwd: [efloraofindia:461745] Bulbophyllum gopalianum from Mizoram To: Heartiest congratulations 👏, Dr. Pankaj Ji Regards On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 12:31 pm Prashant Awale, wrote: > H

Re: [itpmods:18190] Fwd: [efloraofindia:461797] Bulbophyllum gopalianum from Mizoram

Beautiful taxon, most suitable name...congratulations...!! On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 5:33 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Anil Thakur > Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 17:29 > Subject: Re: [itpmods:18190] Fwd: [efloraofindia:461745] Bulbophyllum > gopalianum from

Fwd: [itpmods:18191] Fwd: [efloraofindia:461801] Bulbophyllum gopalianum from Mizoram

-- Forwarded message - From: D.S Rawat Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 19:32 Subject: Re: [itpmods:18191] Fwd: [efloraofindia:461745] Bulbophyllum gopalianum from Mizoram To: itpmods Congratulations🍁🍁🍁 On Fri, 9 Feb, 2024, 5:29 pm Anil Thakur, wrote: > Heartiest congratulations

Re: [efloraofindia:461802] Staphylea cochinchinensis (Lour.) Byng & Christenh. from Assam KD 02 Feb'24

I guess the ID is correct ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 9:02 PM 'Karuna Das' via eFloraofIndia < indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Dear All, > Attached images are *Staphylea cochinchinensis* (Lour.) Byng & > Christenh. [=*Turpinia nepalensis*] ?? from Assam*. *Ple

Re: [efloraofindia:461803] Convolvulaceae species from Assam KD 03, Feb 24

*Ipomoea batatas *(L.) Lam. ??? Wild or cultivated ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 9:11 PM 'Karuna Das' via eFloraofIndia < indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Dear All, > Attached images are Convolvulaceae sp. (?) from Assam*.* Please ID > of the species > > Date :

Re: [efloraofindia:461804] Convolvulaceae species from Assam KD 03, Feb 24

Yes! Saroj sir On Fri, 9 Feb, 2024, 9:09 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > *Ipomoea batatas *(L.) Lam. ??? Wild or cultivated ?? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 9:11 PM 'Karuna Das' via eFloraofIndia < > indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> Attached i

Re: [efloraofindia:461805] Convolvulaceae species from Assam KD 03, Feb 24

OK Mr. Chowdary ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 9:46 PM Mandru Ramesh Chowdary < mandrurameshchowd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes! Saroj sir > > On Fri, 9 Feb, 2024, 9:09 pm Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > >> *Ipomoea batatas *(L.) Lam. ??? Wild or cultivated ?? >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj

[efloraofindia:461806] Re: Rubiaceae: Discospermum sphaerocarpum Dalzell ex Hook.f.

Flowers look different from illustration at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discospermum_sphaerocarpum Pl. check https://efloraofindia.com/2011/11/06/pavetta-indica/ On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 12:25, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, John ji. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: John Parr

Re: [efloraofindia:461808] Flora of Munnar :: Ligustrum perrottetii FOR VALIDATION :: DV13JUL

This is very interesting. I was not aware of the specific differences between the two species. Apart from the distinctive leaf shape and venation, the panicles are larger in Ligustrum gamblei. According to Biotik fruits should be oblong as opposed to obovoid. Dinesh's plant seems to match with

[efloraofindia:461808] Fwd: Poaceae: Apluda mutica

Thanks a lot, Manoj ji -- Forwarded message - From: Manoj Chandran Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 22:41 Subject: Re: Poaceae: Apluda mutica To: J.M. Garg Apluda will have narrowed leaf base and no big awns. This one is Themeda quadrivalvis On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 12:22 PM J.M. Garg w

Re: [efloraofindia:461809] Flora of Munnar :: Ligustrum perrottetii FOR VALIDATION :: DV13JUL

Thanks a lot, Radha ji On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 23:26, radha veach wrote: > This is very interesting. I was not aware of the specific differences > between the two species. Apart from the distinctive leaf shape and > venation, the panicles are larger in Ligustrum gamblei. According to > Biotik frui

Re: [efloraofindia:461811] Convolvulaceae species from Assam KD 03, Feb 24

Thank You Sir. The species is cultivated. With regard Karuna Kanta Das On Friday 9 February 2024 at 21:34:42 UTC+5:30 Saroj Kasaju wrote: > OK Mr. Chowdary ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 9:46 PM Mandru Ramesh Chowdary < > mandrurame...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes! Sar

Re: [efloraofindia:461812] Staphylea cochinchinensis (Lour.) Byng & Christenh. from Assam KD 02 Feb'24

Thank You Sir. With regard Karuna Kanta Das On Friday 9 February 2024 at 20:59:40 UTC+5:30 Saroj Kasaju wrote: > I guess the ID is correct ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 9:02 PM 'Karuna Das' via eFloraofIndia < > indian...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> Dear All, >>

[efloraofindia:461812] Re: Rubiaceae: Ixora polyantha Wight

I think it must be a cultivated plant. I am having doubts as per images at https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/09/ixora-polyantha/ It may be https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/09/ixora-finlaysoniana/ On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 12:27, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, John ji. > > -- Forwarded me

[efloraofindia:461813] Re: Rubiaceae: Mussaenda frondosa L.

1st image may be of some hybird. 2nd image id is OK. On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 12:27, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, John ji. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: John Parrotta > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 00:04 > Subject: Rubiaceae: Mussaenda frondosa L. > To: J.M. Garg > > > *syn

Re: [efloraofindia:461814] Flora of Munnar :: Ligustrum perrottetii FOR VALIDATION :: DV13JUL

Thank you very much, Garg ji, for pointing to the correct ID. Thanks very much Radha for validating the ID. Regards. Dinesh On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 10:26 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Radha ji > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 23:26, radha veach wrote: > >> This is very interesting. I was not awa

[efloraofindia:461815] Re: Rutaceae: Naringi crenulata (Roxb.) Nicolson

Looks different from images at https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/15/naringi-crenulata/ Pl. check https://efloraofindia.com/2015/09/12/terminthia-paniculata/ On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 12:31, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, John ji. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: John Parrotta >

[efloraofindia:461816] Re: Rutaceae: Ruta graveolens L.

Looks different from images at https://efloraofindia.com/2011/05/15/ruta-graveolens/ It is https://efloraofindia.com/2020/06/12/ruta-chalepensis/ On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 12:31, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, John ji. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: John Parrotta > Date: Mon,