Fwd: [efloraofindia:463244] ID 03/02

-- Forwarded message - From: J.M. Garg Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 at 21:03 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:461746] ID 03/02 To: efloraofindia Cc: girish kumar ellezhuthil , vipl...@gmail.com < vipl...@gmail.com>, radha veach , Paradesi Anjaneyulu I think looks close to Oxyceros rugulos

Re: [efloraofindia:463243] Fwd: Regarding identification of the species collected from Khurda on March 24

*Equilabium molle *(Aiton) Mwany. & A.J.Paton ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:22 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Prabhat ji > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Kumar Prabhat Das > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 10:54 > Subject: Regarding identification of the spec

Re: [efloraofindia:463239] Plant ID

To me appears close to images at https://efloraofindia.com/2020/06/08/veronica-undulata/ On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 15:42, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > I thought of it as something close to Ammannia: > https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/05/ammannia/ > But unable to

[efloraofindia:463238] Re: Plant ID help 110324SD1

To me appears close to images at https://efloraofindia.com/2020/06/08/veronica-undulata/ On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 at 12:57, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Crassulaceae ?? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 12:51 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> From Sayani ji: >> Posting again with a changed

Re: [efloraofindia:463237] Id of Tree -ID12032024SH1

Yes Garg ji,looks like Schefflera roxburghii.Thanks a lot. Regards. On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:11 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think close to images at > https://efloraofindia.com/2020/04/11/schefflera-roxburghii/ > > On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 at 16:54, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> I have no idea. >> Thank y

Re: [efloraofindia:463236] Id of plant -ID15032024SH2

Thanks Sabu Ji, Rregards On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:34 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Sabu ji > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Mamiyil Sabu > Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 11:59 > Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:463013] Id of plant -ID15032024SH2 > To: J.M. Garg > > > May be Hedy

Re: [efloraofindia:463234] Plant ID 200324_4

*Pisum sativum *L. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 3:12 PM Sayani Das wrote: > Need help with this plant ID. > > Bhopal. Black soil. > 27/02/2024 > > Thanks, > Sayani > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "eFloraofIndia" group. > T

Re: [efloraofindia:463232] Plant ID 200324_3

*Vicia sativa *L. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 3:09 PM Sayani Das wrote: > Hello, > > Need help with this plant ID. > > Bhopal > 27/02/24 > > Thanks > Sayani > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "eFloraofIndia" group. > To unsu

Re: [efloraofindia:463228] Plant ID

Yes, waiting for it. On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 at 12:08, Sayani Das wrote: > Sure. Let me get back with more info. > > On Sunday, March 17, 2024 at 11:30:38 AM UTC+5:30 J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Hi, Sayani ji, >> Pl. post high res. image as details are fuzzy. >> It appears to be from Vernonieae, something

[efloraofindia:463226] Re: Fwd: Pandanus furcatus Roxb.

Thanks, Nadaf ji On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 12:57, abnadaf wrote: > Most probably Pandanus nepalensis, need fruit pics to confirm. Surely not > P. furcatus. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Prof. Nadaf > > On 2024-03-19 17:16, J.M. Garg wrote: > > Thanks, Saroj ji > > -- Forwarded message -

[efloraofindia:463225] Fwd: Pandanus furcatus Roxb.

Most of the database says it is the syn. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju -- Forwarded message - From: Saroj Kasaju Date: Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:02 AM Subject: Re: Pandanus furcatus Roxb. To: J.M. Garg Cc: efloraofindia https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:670

[efloraofindia:463224] Re: Fabaceae

Yes, I understand. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:55 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > In fact, Asteraceae > is > more scientifically arranged, being a very large family. > Pl. see. > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 12:35, J.M

[efloraofindia:463223] Re: Fabaceae

In fact, Asteraceae is more scientifically arranged, being a very large family. Pl. see. On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 12:35, J.M. Garg wrote: > Still it will be better to keep large genera like Alysicarpus, Bauhnia, > Crotalria, Indigo

[efloraofindia:463222] Re: Fabaceae

Still it will be better to keep large genera like Alysicarpus, Bauhnia, Crotalria, Indigo etc.out it (for the sake of non updation of family pages when such large genus pages are updated etc., reducing the no. of family pages like Fabaceae 1, Fabaceae 2 etc. to the bare minimum). Also we can explor