Re: [efloraofindia:463686] Re: 546 ID wild Orchid

May be Polystachya On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 1:32 PM Sam Kuzhalanattu wrote: > Sharing more images > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2024, 1:27 pm Sam Kuzhalanattu, > wrote: > >> Sharing more images >> >> On Sun, 31 Mar 2024, 1:24 pm Sam Kuzhalanattu, >> wrote: >> >>> Sharing more images >>> >>> On Sun, 31 Mar

Re: [efloraofindia:463553] Bluish black fruit sp. from Brahmagiri Wildlife sanctuary

Machilus macrantha Robi On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:10 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Lalithamba ji > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Lalithamba Avadhanam > Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 14:34 > Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:463288] Bluish black fruit sp. from Brahmagiri > Wildlife san

[efloraofindia:463166] Re: For identification

Dear Garg ji et al, I have looked a little further and now think this is probablya species of Steudnera, because of the very shallow sinus at rear of blade, and the very rounded (bulbous?) sterile appendage. I have not yet found enough images of Steudnera spp. inflorescences for comparison. I

[efloraofindia:463123] Re: For identification

Dear Garg ji and Khagendra ji, My suggestion is that this is an undescribed, new species of Colocasia, though it is so extraordinary I wonder if it should be given a new genus status. Is it possible to get further photos with greater clarity, and including the vegetative parts and reproduction

Re: [efloraofindia:462102] Re: Actinodaphnae lanceolata....?

This could be Neolitsea sp. Robi On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 3:44 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Tapas ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Thu, 15 Feb, 2024, 15:22 Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > >> The photograph is insufficient for arriving at conclusion

Re: [efloraofindia:460964] 525 ID wild tree

Strombosia ceylanica On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:02 PM Dr E S Santhosh Kumar < santhoshkuma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anacolosa densiflora? Olacaceae > > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, 21:15 J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >> >> -- Forwarded message - >> Fro

[efloraofindia:441399] Re: SK 3690 08 February 2023 - Araceae

Dear Saroj, I suppose that this is Alocasia fornicata (Roxb.) Schott. There is now a very nice set of photos of Alocasia species at https://www.aroidpedia.com/ ..together with many of the original taxonomic descriptions. Best regards, Peter (I'm leaving next Saturday for Kolkata to join BSI c

[efloraofindia:400157] Re: Araceae ID from Nepal- 1

These variegated Colocasia spp. are really difficult to identify based only on the variegation. This is likely C. affinis as suggested, but both C. fallax and C. affinis are variable in their display of variegation, and we need to consider the possibility of as yet undescribed species also havin

[efloraofindia:400125] Re: Araceae ID from Nepal- 2

Colocasia esculenta, likely spreading by stolons here. Not necessarily from a garden; could be part of a natural population with this all-green colouring; need more context to suggest more. P. Get Outlook for iOS From: J.M. Garg Sent: Sun

[efloraofindia:400123] Re: Araceae ID from Nepal- 3

Remusatia sp., Get Outlook for iOS From: J.M. Garg Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2021 11:33:12 PM To: efloraofindia Cc: Sourav Mahmud Subject: Fwd: Araceae ID from Nepal- 3 Maybe some Alocasia

[efloraofindia:397933] Re: SK 2952 08 September 2021

: Sunday, 12 September 2021 8:25 PM To: Peter J MATTHEWS Cc: efloraofindia; Saroj Kasaju Subject: Re: SK 2952 08 September 2021 Thanks a lot, Peter ji. On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 16:55, Peter J MATTHEWS mailto:p...@minpaku.ac.jp>> wrote: Greetings Saroj ji, This looks very unusual to me, though

[efloraofindia:397927] Re: SK 2952 08 September 2021

Greetings Saroj ji, This looks very unusual to me, though it is hard to judge colour in the lighting (camera flash?). The spathe and spadix have a general shape similar to what I have seen in certain wild C. esculenta populations (with very long upper spathe), but your spathe appears almost tr

Re: [efloraofindia:389353] Need help with strange, post-rain flower

Dear all, I would guess it is Amorphophallus, as the genus extends into relatively dry regions with underground tubers that are drought resistant. P, From: J.M. Garg Sent: Sunday, 20 June 2021 7:23 PM To: efloraofindia Cc: Fazal Rashid; Saroj Kasaju Sub

Re: [efloraofindia:385172] Caladium for ID

Dear Devi Nair et al, I would rate this as C. affinis var. jenningsii, especially since it is circulating as an ornamental in a nursery. But without floral details it is hard to make very definite statements an comparisons with other variegated species of Colocasia. I'm sure this is not C. fal

Re: [efloraofindia:384519] MS,April,2021/02 Colocasia sp. for id

Dear Sawmliana ji, Thanks.. This is not C. fallax... this appears to be C. affinis var. jenningsii (with the caveat that it may be a different species than C. affinis Deva & Naithani 1985) Th sinus is very shallow, the green is a brighter shade of green. Also: the number of lateral veins bra

Re: [efloraofindia:384519] MS, April, 2021/05 Colocasia sp. for Id.

Yes... this is very typical of wild C. esculenta, and is undoubtedly producing abundant stolons to produce such a dense and spreading patch (though it is almost certainly a breeding population as well). P. From: J.M. Garg Sent: Monday, 3 May 2021 7:14 P

Re: [efloraofindia:384461] MS, April, 2014/03 Colocasia sp. for id.

Dear Sawmliana ji, This is clearly C. fallax in my view. The blade has a generally dark hue, and mostly rounded outline with distinct sinus. The pale blush, and purple patches on blades (not in your photo, but seen by me in Meghalaya) are highly variable, within and between local populations.

Re: [efloraofindia:383836] Wild Alocasia sp. 1 (?) from Kamrup district, Assam

Dear all, That looks very much like Colocasia fallax, which is common in Meghalaya. It seems to show considerable variation in the blush on the blade and the presence or absence of dark coloured patches on the blades (even within one population), though fully green blades seem to be the most co

Re: [efloraofindia:383836] Araceae, Arecaceae and Zingiberaceae Fortnight: August 1 to 14, 2014 : Remusatia vivipara For Validation : Araceae : Jim Corbett : 110814 : AK-4

Dear JMG and ASK, I would go for Steudnera sp. for the plant with very shallow sinus (left) and C. ?affinis for the plant on right (a more pale green blade than C. fallax), but I'm very uncertain on this one. Peter From: J.M. Garg Sent: Tuesday, 27 Apr

Re: [efloraofindia:383734] MS, April,2021/01 Colocasia sp. for id.

Dear MS and JMG, Thank you very much for sending this. This is not Alocasia. The mature spathe and the pistillate zone, and the leaf blade all resemble Colocasia in my view. The dimensions f the spadix, with enlarged sterile interstice, between the female and male zones, very short male zone, a

Re: [efloraofindia:207078] IBIS-Flora: A working Flora of India with a baseline database

Foundation for Ecological Security <http://fes.org.in/> and DMNCT <http://flora.biota.in/node/238857> Thanks and regards On 24 November 2014 at 14:34, min J wrote: > Dear Usha di, > > IBIS(Indian Biodiversity Information System) is an initiation of > Foundation for

Re: [efloraofindia:207077] IBIS-Flora: A working Flora of India with a baseline database

nks, Minal ji & Arpit ji, for a nice beginning. >> Better things will certainly follow. >> >> On 24 November 2014 at 13:02, min J wrote: >> >>> *THE IBIS FLORA PORTAL* <http://flora.biota.in/> >>> >>> >>> >>> A hundred y

[efloraofindia:207070] IBIS-Flora: A working Flora of India with a baseline database

*THE IBIS FLORA PORTAL* A hundred years after the publication of “The Flora of British India”, the time has arrived to compile and update the data on floral biodiversity of India with the knowledge that we have gleaned in the last century. Digital technologies provide us

Re: [efloraofindia:187212] Pods of Parkia biglandulosa : For ID Confirmation : 020514 : AK-5

Thank you for the correction Radha On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:40 PM, radha veach wrote: > To me it is Parkia biglandulosa > > regards > Radha > > > On Friday, May 2, 2014 10:40:24 AM UTC+5:30, minsja wrote: > >> Seems like Delonix elata >> >> >> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Aarti S. Khale wro

Re: [efloraofindia:187200] Pods of Parkia biglandulosa : For ID Confirmation : 020514 : AK-5

Seems like Delonix elata On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > A tall tree growing straight, with hanging green pods in bunches. > Kindly confirm id. > Aarti > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubsc

Re: [efloraofindia:187198] Fissistigma sp. for ID

Seems like miliusa tomentosa On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:40 AM, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: > Date: 19 April 2014 00:00 > Subject: [efloraofindia:186528] Fissistigma sp. for ID > To: indiantreepix@googlegroups.c

Re: [efloraofindia:186423] For ID 170320014 - SS- Is it Balanophora

*Balanophora fungosa *J. R. Forster & G. Forster On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:09 AM, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > > Probably B. abrreviata -- SANTHOSH > > Please consider Balanopho

[efloraofindia:82141] Re: Tecoma stans - Yellow Bells

Thanks, Subrata ji. On Sep 18, 11:07 am, Subrata Mahapatra wrote: > Friends, > I would like to share with you Indian names for Techoma stans,( first > identified by Dr. Kuriacose ) which were desirable. From the web :- > Kannada - Koranekalar > Tamil - Nagasam-Bagam, Sonnapatti > Telegu - Pachago

Re: [efloraofindia:27148] Saplings of Devdaru

Regarding growing Deodars in the WG, isn't it more natural to let the native/indigenous (pls choose correct term) species grow? Secondly, I wish Nudrat ji luck with his attempt in growing Deodars, it is heartening to see people like him trying to do so. Just my two bits :) regards, ~ jai On Wed,

[indiantreepix:18263] Re: Fwd: Macaranga indica?

Thanks Santhosh! ~ jai On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:31 AM, santhosh kumar es < santhoshkuma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mr Jai, > > Your plant seems to be Macaranga peltata > > Santhosh > > 2009/9/13 J > >> Hi Santhosh, >> >> Is it the same a

[indiantreepix:13633] Re: Jasmines in India

Thanks for the information akbhatt! Just one change, Jui in marathi is same as Juhi in hindi.. so Jui =* Jasminum auriculatum* and Jai = *J. officinale*(my grandpa had both Jai and Jui in his garden and both were fragrant and white) Thanks :) ~ *J. officinale* On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:53 PM

[indiantreepix:13520] Re: Scientific names of Plants

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Madhuri Pejaver wrote: > > > Dear Aparna, > So nice of you to write all details. > But--- > when some differences are seen from the sps how to decide whether it is a > subsps or a varity? > Madhuri > > --- On Thu, 18/6/09, Aparna Watve wrote: > > > From: Aparna Wa

[indiantreepix:13280] Re: Jasmines in India

कुंद. >>Best wishes >> - Tabish >> >> >> On Jun 16, 10:20 am, Anand Kumar Bhatt wrote: >> > Various varieties of Jasmines are found in India, and matching their >> > botanical names to prevalent Hindi names has always been a nightmare to >

[indiantreepix:12835] Re: Small tree id at Sudhagadh

Thanks Shekhar! Regards, jai On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Shekhar Marathe wrote: > This is caseria elliptica. It looks nice also after the fruits open up. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indian

[indiantreepix:12834] Re: Tree id at Sudhagadh

; > > From: Dinesh Valke > Subject: [indiantreepix:12831] Re: Tree id at Sudhagadh > To: "J" > Cc: indiantreepix@googlegroups.com > Date: Monday, June 1, 2009, 10:45 AM > > > ¿ *Lepisanthes tetraphylla* ? > Regards. > > > > > > > > >