No tourism in core zone is ok for me but that doesnt mean there would be no
patrolling.
Shoot at sight in the core zone should be there. Who ever goes, its their
mistake. I have seen how educated tourists behave in the core zone and also
those of the rich freaks who go to see tigers with a bottl
I am afraid that when there are no watch full eyes...the FD, as we know,
would be less concerned about forests and the poachers would make a bounty
of it.
On 24 July 2012 16:10, Satish Phadke wrote:
> No tourism apparently is good.But the poachers are more smart. They might
> connect with some f
Pankaj ji,
I am afraid that I would support this judgement. No tourism in core zone
would bring more problem for TIGERS.
On 24 July 2012 16:02, Dr Pankaj Kumar wrote:
> Wow this is something I am purely in favour of.
> 10,000 rs fine. What a joke
> Pankaj
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 14
Wow this is something I am purely in favour of.
10,000 rs fine. What a joke
Pankaj
On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 14:51:49 UTC+8, Rajesh Sachdev wrote:
>
> Supreme Court has today ordered that tourism be banned in core areas of
> tiger reserves.
>
> It has said this ban should continue till it
4 matches
Mail list logo
