Sorry, on second thought, I think I am wrong. This is not Lauraceae. Pankaj
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Pankaj Kumar <sahanipan...@gmail.com> wrote: > 7000m seems too high. But is it some Lauraceae? > Pankaj > > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Shantanu Bhattacharya <shnt...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi sharing a shot of a tree from the hills of Lava (7000metres). >> Can someone give the ID? >> >> regards >> Shantanu : ) > > > > -- > *********************************************** > "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!" > > > Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae) > Research Associate > Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project > Department of Habitat Ecology > Wildlife Institute of India > Post Box # 18 > Dehradun - 248001, India > -- *********************************************** "TAXONOMISTS GETTING EXTINCT AND SPECIES DATA DEFICIENT !!" Pankaj Kumar Ph.D. (Orchidaceae) Research Associate Greater Kailash Sacred Landscape Project Department of Habitat Ecology Wildlife Institute of India Post Box # 18 Dehradun - 248001, India
