Shrikant ji Issue is: Is there really a valid specific epithet augustifolia? Our analysis points perhaps it is not. The meaning of angustifolia was explained by Pankaj ji in his first post in the thread.
-- Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:07 PM, shrikant ingalhalikar <le...@rediffmail.com > wrote: > Permit me to add etymological meaning of angustifolia as 'narrow- > leaved'. Does that sort out the issue? Regards, > > On Feb 6, 8:05 am, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is really interesting > > > > - > > > > Amaranthaceae *Iresine* *augustifolia* > > Euphrasen< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=EA37D0F1C49F...> > > -- Beskr. St. Barthel. 165. (IK) > > > > - > > > > Amaranthaceae *Iresine* *angustifolia* Hort. ex > > Moq.< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do?id=60721-1&back_page=%2...> > > -- Prodr. (DC.) 13(2): 343. 1849 [5 May 1849] (IK) > > > > - > > > > Amaranthaceae *Iresine* *angustifolia* Rich. ex > > Moq.< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do?id=60722-1&back_page=%2...> > > -- Prodr. (DC.) 13(2): 348, 353. 1849 [5 May 1849] (IK) > > > > (Last two missing from The Plant List) > > > > - > > > > Asclepiadaceae *Fockea* *augustifolia* > > K.Schum.< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=EA37D0F1C49F...> > > -- Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 17(1-2): 146. 1893 [9 May 1893] (IK) > > > > - > > > > Asclepiadaceae *Fockea* *angustifolia* > > K.Schum.< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do?id=1004792-1&back_page=...> > > -- Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 17(1-2): 146. 1893 [9 May 1893] ; in IK > Suppl. 1 > > as 'augustifolia' (IK) > > > > (augustifolia again missing from The Plant List) > > > > - > > > > Asteraceae *Laggera* *augustifolia* > > Hayata< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=EA37D0F1C49F...> > > -- Icon. Pl. Formosan. 8: 54. 1919 [25 Mar 1919] (IK) > > > > IPNI does not have entry for Laggera angustifolia > > > > (The Plant List has *Laggera* *alata* var. *angustifolia* (Hayata) > > Yamam.<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/gcc-67324> as > > well as *Laggera* *angustifolia* > > Hayata<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/gcc-112194> but > > none for Laggera augustifolia) > > > > - > > > > Ebenaceae *Diospyros* *augustifolia* (Miq.) > > Kosterm.< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=EA37D0F1C49F...> > > -- Ceylon J. Sci., Biol. Sci. 12(2): 106 (1977). (IK) > > > > - > > > > Ebenaceae *Diospyros* *angustifolia* Audib. ex > > Spach< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do?id=322077-1&back_page=%...> > > -- Hist. Nat. Vég. (Spach) 9: 405. 1840 [15 Aug 1840] (IK) > > > > (The Plant List has *Diospyros* *angustifolia* Audib. ex > > Spach<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2769365> as > > well as *Diospyros* *angustifolia* (Miq.) > > Kosterm.<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2769366> > > [Illegitimate] > > but not Diospyros augustifolia) > > > > - > > > > Lecythidaceae *Eschweilera* *augustifolia* > > Mart.< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=EA37D0F1C49F...> > > -- Flora 20(2, Beibl.): 89. 1837 (IK) > > > > IPNI does not have an entry for *Eschweilera angustifolia* > > > > (The Plant List has *Eschweilera* *angustifolia* > > Mart.<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-313756> but > > no entry for Eschweilera augustifolia) > > > > - > > > > Monimiaceae *Hortonia* *augustifolia* > > Trim.< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=EA37D0F1C49F...> > > -- Syst. Cat. Fl. Pl. Ceylon (1885) 75 et Handl. Fl. Ceyl. iii. 437. > > (IK) > > > > IPNI does not have an entry for Hortonia Hortonia angustifolia > > > > (The Plant has both *Hortonia* *angustifolia* > > Trim.<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/tro-21200346> as > > well as *Hortonia* *augustifolia* > > Trimen<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2853685> with > > same citation and same page number) but then we have seen the link > > > > http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924000414510#page/n83/mode/2up > > > > - > > > > Orchidaceae *Eria* *augustifolia* Ridl. ex > > Stapf< > http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do;jsessionid=EA37D0F1C49F...> > > -- Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Bot. 4(2): 237. 1894 [1894-96 publ. Dec > > 1894] (IK) > > > > IPNI does not have an entry for Eria angustifolia > > > > (The Plant List has *Eria* *angustifolia* > > Ridl.<http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-70877> as > > well as *Eria* *augustifolia* Ridl. ex > > ... > > > > read more »
