On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Guys, any thoughts on this? I want this in for BETA2...
>
> On Apr 1, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-986
>>
>> As indicated in my comments, there's two room for two types
+1 for Externalizer/AdvancedExternalizer.
Dan
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>
>> Guys, any thoughts on this? I want this in for BETA2...
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
On 12 Apr 2011, at 10:51, Dan Berindei wrote:
> +1 for Externalizer/AdvancedExternalizer.
+1, we already do that for Cache/AdvancedCache.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>
>>> Guys, any thoug
can't you run the Callable locally on a clone of it? If Callable is Clonable
then clone it in an orthodox manner, otherwise clone it by
serializing/deseralizing it.
On 11 Apr 2011, at 19:58, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> Sanne,
>
> I thought about that as well but I do not see a way to ensure t
Yeah, eventually those were the names that made most sense to me.
FYI, the pull req for this is up now:
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/245
I'm now working on updating http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-16198
On Apr 12, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
> On 12 Apr 2011, a
I'm working full-speed on finishing JMX tooling on recovery. The coding might
be finished but the review will take longer, so not sure it will get in.
On 11 Apr 2011, at 11:09, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently targeting BETA2 for this Friday. How does this sound? I know
> som
Any chance we can delay til Monday? I had a poc over virtual nodes I would like
to push in to get some feedback but I have lost the code due to laptop death. I
can recreate it, but need a day or so (and won't get to my spare machine until
Friday).
--
Pete Muir
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pet
Yeah, it would be too strict to require Callable to be Cloneable so I
would opt out to serialization/deserialization as a clone method.
Galder, do out have a recommended mechanism for this in your marshalers?
Thanks Mircea
On 11-04-12 12:59 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
> can't you run the Callable
On 12 Apr 2011, at 18:45, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> Yeah, it would be too strict to require Callable to be Cloneable so I would
> opt out to serialization/deserialization as a clone method.
yes, but you can still check to see if the Callable is Clonable first. Only if
it is not use serializa
