Hi
Am beginner to STOMP. I gone through the STOMP pdf, it was good. Am trying to
execute STOMP clients in Javascript
But It is unable to execute var client=Stomp.client(URL) statement. Please help
me to resolve the Issue
Regards
Pavana
DISCLAIMER: This email message and all attachments are conf
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Erik Salter wrote:
> Wouldn't any rehash affect the locality of these generated keys, or am I
> missing something?
>
Indeed, the moment a new node joins the cluster you have no guarantees
that the keys that used to be on the same node are still stored
together.
The hashcode is the same either way:
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/infinispan/marshall/MarshalledValue.java#L193
On 12 May 2011, at 16:59, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> thank you.
> Not very critical for functionality, but now I'm wondering if the
> cons
Funny you should mention this -- this is a VERY critical consideration for us.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: infinispan-dev-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:infinispan-dev-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Sanne Grinovero
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 11:59 AM
To: infinispan -Dev List
thank you.
Not very critical for functionality, but now I'm wondering if the
consistent hash is being calculated on the binary form of the key?
Just curious if we might end up with inconsistent definitions of
"owner" in case it's possible to have the hash function invoked at
different points of the
Just a heads up. No point wasting much time on this, JSR 107 is in for a pretty
major revamp.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/jsr107
Two threads in particular to note:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jsr107/X0VhYs-uCWE
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jsr107/AkI2e4pJhyc
On 12 May 2011, at 16:06, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> On 11 May 2011, at 18:27, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> I'm also wondering how the equals is performed on a serialized key; I
>> assume they are compared as byte[], but if that's the case that should
>> be clearly documented as it would ignore an
On 11 May 2011, at 18:27, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I'm also wondering how the equals is performed on a serialized key; I
> assume they are compared as byte[], but if that's the case that should
> be clearly documented as it would ignore any custom equals()
> implementation.
Your assumption is co
After finishing the first iteration of implementing ISPN-961 - Spring
Integration - I would like to turn my attention back to ISPN-78 - Large
Object Support. Specifically, I would like to finalise the API before
concentrating on the hard stuff, namely locking and transaction support.
These are
Thanks, that helped!
On 12 May 2011, at 09:10, Dan Berindei wrote:
> I disabled the Osmorc plugin and that seemed to stop it.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Mircea Markus
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Whenever I'm switching branches from 4.2.x to master the build in IDEA takes
>> ag
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
>
> On 12 mai 2011, at 11:18, Dan Berindei wrote:
>
>> That seems like a lot of overhead to me, and forcing the user to
>> provide the classloader doesn't seem that bad in comparison. Perhaps
>> we should use something other than a thread-lo
On 12 mai 2011, at 11:18, Dan Berindei wrote:
> That seems like a lot of overhead to me, and forcing the user to
> provide the classloader doesn't seem that bad in comparison. Perhaps
> we should use something other than a thread-local for this though, so
> that users can do a onto the result of
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:18 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
> On 11/05/2011 17:54, Dan Berindei wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>>> Were we developing for OSGi I would certainly agree with you. However in
>>> many environments today we can reasonably expect the TCCL to
On 11-05-11 11:23 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
> If ReentrantReadWriteLock would allow upgrades then you would get a
> deadlock when two threads both hold the read lock and try to upgrade
> to a write lock at the same time.
> There's always a trade-off...
>
> I'm not familiar with the code, but are you
I disabled the Osmorc plugin and that seemed to stop it.
Dan
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whenever I'm switching branches from 4.2.x to master the build in IDEA takes
> ages(even more, about 5 mins!!!). Most of the time is spent is "Building
> non-OSGi libra
15 matches
Mail list logo
