On Jun 6, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> On 11-06-06 6:06 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>> Hmmm, I don't think the replication timeout has an effect during state
>> transfer. Repl timeout is for individual rpc calls.
>>
>
> It is, *however* repl timeout can cause state transfer t
Hello all,
in this scenario we have the Infinispan Lucene Directory using
batching (DummyTransaction), eviction and passivation to keep the
amount of memory being used for the index under control; I'm using
LIRS but experienced the same issue with all other strategies.
As you can see from the foll
On 7 Jun 2011, at 13:13, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hello all,
> in this scenario we have the Infinispan Lucene Directory using
> batching (DummyTransaction), eviction and passivation to keep the
> amount of memory being used for the index under control; I'm using
> LIRS but experienced the same is
2011/6/7 Mircea Markus :
>
> On 7 Jun 2011, at 13:13, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> in this scenario we have the Infinispan Lucene Directory using
> batching (DummyTransaction), eviction and passivation to keep the
> amount of memory being used for the index under control; I'm using
> LIR
On 11-06-07 5:00 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
>
>> It is, *however* repl timeout can cause state transfer to timeout due to
>> locking of that processing lock in DistSync and that is why I think state
>> transfer timeout has to be at least a
So, I removed all locking logic from EvictionManagerImpl, all my
issues are solved and all of core tests look like no worse than usual.
I'm still hoping to understand if there was an important reason to
lock, or I will send a pull request ;)
Sanne
2011/6/7 Sanne Grinovero :
> 2011/6/7 Mircea Mark
Hi guys
What do we have in store for CR5? What's been committed since CR4, and what's
in the pipeline for CR5? Does a release on Monday (13th) make sense?
Cheers
Manik
--
Manik Surtani
ma...@jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org
I just hit this case locally. http://pastie.org/2035067
This is running with a hacked AS7, in the sense that IronJacamar
(JBJCA-594), Hibernate JPA and the EJB3.1 container are registering TSR
interposed synchronizations
(https://github.com/scottmarlow/jboss-as/commits/jpa_tsr).
This is for a
Hi Galder.
An easy way to test is to use Manik's sample (
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan-sample-module). Just change the id
of BulkDeleteCommand to a core command id (like 22).
Israel
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Israel, do you have a test case for this?
I'll be mainly working on perf bechmark, so no deliverables from me.
On 7 Jun 2011, at 17:19, Manik Surtani wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> What do we have in store for CR5? What's been committed since CR4, and
> what's in the pipeline for CR5? Does a release on Monday (13th) make sense?
>
> Cheers
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
