[infinispan-dev] 5.0.0.CR6 tomorrow

2011-06-16 Thread Manik Surtani
Guys, can we be ready for this? I think the only real blocker left is stuff from Pete. -- Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org ___ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.o

Re: [infinispan-dev] 5.0.0.CR6 tomorrow

2011-06-16 Thread Vladimir Blagojevic
For me test suite had a few hiccups last night locally and I tested all my work against master rolled back a few commits. On 11-06-16 10:32 AM, Manik Surtani wrote: > Guys, can we be ready for this? I think the only real blocker left is stuff > from Pete. > -- > Manik Surtani > ma...@jboss.org >

Re: [infinispan-dev] 5.0.0.CR6 tomorrow

2011-06-16 Thread Manik Surtani
Urgent commits? Do I need to hold up the release, or do you think we can have them back in by tomorrow my time? Sent from my mobile phone On 16 Jun 2011, at 15:37, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > For me test suite had a few hiccups last night locally and I tested all my > work against master rol

Re: [infinispan-dev] Slight change to NBST

2011-06-16 Thread Manik Surtani
+1, looks good. Sent from my mobile phone On 15 Jun 2011, at 15:01, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > On 11-06-15 3:52 AM, Galder ZamarreƱo wrote: >> Hey Vladimir, >> >> Couple of things, did you consider putting that logic in JGroupsTransport >> rather than RpcManagerImpl? It looks to be more su

Re: [infinispan-dev] Slight change to NBST

2011-06-16 Thread Mircea Markus
+1 On 16 Jun 2011, at 16:05, Manik Surtani wrote: > +1, looks good. > > Sent from my mobile phone > > On 15 Jun 2011, at 15:01, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > >> On 11-06-15 3:52 AM, Galder ZamarreƱo wrote: >>> Hey Vladimir, >>> >>> Couple of things, did you consider putting that logic in JGro

Re: [infinispan-dev] Partial state transfer

2011-06-16 Thread Vladimir Blagojevic
In another words the essential problem is that digest and channel state are per channel abstractions and they do not fit nicely with higher level abstractions like substates? We use partial state transfer in Infinispan and we need to address this. What is the time frame here? 5.0 final release?

Re: [infinispan-dev] Partial state transfer

2011-06-16 Thread Bela Ban
Correct. Time frame would ideally be 5.0, but realistically it will probably be 5.1. Is that feasible from a roadmap point of view ? On 6/16/11 6:47 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > In another words the essential problem is that digest and channel state > are per channel abstractions and they do

Re: [infinispan-dev] 5.0.0.CR6 tomorrow

2011-06-16 Thread Pete Muir
I will get what I have in first thing. On 16 Jun 2011, at 15:32, Manik Surtani wrote: > Guys, can we be ready for this? I think the only real blocker left is stuff > from Pete. > -- > Manik Surtani > ma...@jboss.org > twitter.com/maniksurtani > > Lead, Infinispan > http://www.infinispan.org >

[infinispan-dev] new context Flag: SKIP_INDEXING

2011-06-16 Thread Sanne Grinovero
Hello all, I was having a quick look into https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1179 to see if I could get a solution in tomorrow's release; The problem is that during preload from a cacheloader, the entries are added into the caches as if they where just "put", and so they will be added again to t