On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 24 October 2011 12:58, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Galder
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
ISPN-1470
Hi Galder, sorry it took so long to reply.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Btw, forgot to attach the log:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Hi Dan,
Re: http://goo.gl/TGwrP
There's a few of this in the Hot Rod server+client
Can't you just skip loading state and be happy with the state you
receive from peers? More data will be lazily loaded.
Applying of course only when you're not the only/first node in the
grid, in which case you have to load.
Right, we could preload only on the first node. With a shared
On Oct 26, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
Hi Galder, sorry it took so long to reply.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Btw, forgot to attach the log:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Hi Dan,
Re:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
Hi Galder
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
ISPN-1470 (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1470) raises an
interesting question: if the
On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
On 24 October 2011 12:58, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Galder
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
ISPN-1470
On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
1. We hijack javadoc processing to generate the RHQ xml file, which means
that the annotations need be available beyond the compile phase. This
forces the annotation, and rhq annotations, dependencies to be required.
At the time of
I was gunning for beta3 but I don't think I'm going to make it.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 26, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Dan Berindei wrote:
Hi Galder, sorry it took so long to reply.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Galder Zamarreño
Hi,
On 25 October 2011 18:11, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2011, at 4:58 PM, Kevin Pollet wrote:
On 24 October 2011 16:51, Peter Muir pm...@redhat.com wrote:
If we didnt use any jsr107 annotations with this cache.
Without any jsr107 annotations it works fine
First of all, what is the problem that the Hot Rod client has depending on
core/ as it is? It's not clear from the JIRA.
On Oct 25, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
Hi all,
I've been looking into refactoring certain interfaces and common classes
as part of
On 10/26/2011 06:29 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
First of all, what is the problem that the Hot Rod client has depending on
core/ as it is? It's not clear from the JIRA.
Personally, what I don't like about the infinispan-core dependency is
that it makes you falsely think that you should keep
11 matches
Mail list logo
