On 10/27/2011 12:15 AM, Michal Linhard wrote:
On 10/26/2011 06:29 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
First of all, what is the problem that the Hot Rod client has depending on
core/ as it is? It's not clear from the JIRA.
Personally, what I don't like about the infinispan-core dependency is
that it
Jumping on this thread a little late, we should look at what we can reuse from
AS7's console. There must be a lot of boilerplate there that can be extracted
into a jboss-cli-common library.
On 14 Oct 2011, at 10:03, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
On 10/14/2011 10:58 AM, Michal Linhard wrote:
On 18 Oct 2011, at 17:50, Mircea Markus wrote:
It's like the good rule of never commit when you're drunk (coding is
allowed).
ROFL!
Excellent! :-)
--
Manik Surtani
ma...@jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org
Sanne - you should add this as a warning section to
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Contributing+-+Source+Control :-)
On 18 Oct 2011, at 16:09, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
1) If you have warnings about Merge made by recursive you have to
fix it rebasing.
2) If you have warnings about
On 27 October 2011 14:22, Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org wrote:
Sanne - you should add this as a warning section
to https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Contributing+-+Source+Control
:-)
Done
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
Read all about it in: http://goo.gl/N5cf4
Btw, thanks to everyone involved in this BETA3 release. We did the release in
barely 1.5 weeks and we managed to cram in 26 issues!
The testsuite is looking pretty stable already with only ~15 errors in the
entire testsuite!
Cheers,
--
Galder
Nicely done!
On 27 Oct 2011, at 15:36, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Read all about it in: http://goo.gl/N5cf4
Btw, thanks to everyone involved in this BETA3 release. We did the release in
barely 1.5 weeks and we managed to cram in 26 issues!
The testsuite is looking pretty stable already
We ain't finished yet with the BETA releases for the 5.1 series.
Pete's new XML configuration, Manik's versioned API, and Mircea's further
locking improvements are still to come.
We have planned for BETA4 to be out on 7th of November, so please bear that in
mind.
Also, a few of us will be
On 27 Oct 2011, at 07:51, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
For a grand total of just over 4MB. As Yoda would say, size matters not,
but seeing pointless dependencies in there such as jgroups,
rhq-pluginAnnotations and jandex does make it look unpolished and
unprofessional.
Plus in general it's
From a client code perspective, no changes are necessary because starting
with 5.1.0.BETA3, Hot Rod clients talk to servers using this latest protocol.
Must clients and servers use the same version - is 1.1 backward compatible? I
understand there's no dev changes, just curious about impact
On 10/27/2011 04:34 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
So +1 to all of Tristan's recommendations in his original email.
Regarding schedule ?
Tristan
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
On 27 Oct 2011, at 16:01, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
On 10/27/2011 04:34 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
So +1 to all of Tristan's recommendations in his original email.
Regarding schedule ?
As in, for 5.1? Again, I'm happy with this.
--
Manik Surtani
ma...@jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Lead,
On 10/27/2011 05:40 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
On 27 Oct 2011, at 16:01, Tristan Tarrant wrote:
On 10/27/2011 04:34 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
So +1 to all of Tristan's recommendations in his original email.
Regarding schedule ?
As in, for 5.1? Again, I'm happy with this.
Ok, I'll issue an
On 20 Oct 2011, at 08:47, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Why are we preferring to provide more cache misses slower
performance, to fake a slightly better precision in eviction?
I guess this is the main question, how much worse would the eviction
precision be if we only relied on the periodic
On 24 Oct 2011, at 13:20, Mircea Markus wrote:
That's very good news! You should advertise such changes at least
dropping a line here; indeed you might remember me adding SKIP_LOCK in
many places to prevent this, not sure if I was skipping the ones which
where needed for cacheloaders
On 20 Oct 2011, at 16:18, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
Besides pointing out the Cassandra CacheLoader, I think that at some
point we should spend some time tuning testing the FS CacheLoader to
remove it's experimental flag and actually suggest using it.
I think we should also pursue
On 27 October 2011 16:58, Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org wrote:
On 20 Oct 2011, at 08:47, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Why are we preferring to provide more cache misses slower
performance, to fake a slightly better precision in eviction?
I guess this is the main question, how much worse would
Fantastic.
On Oct 27, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
I'm opening one for GlusterFS, seems like a perfect partner.
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
On 27 Oct 2011, at 18:25, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
I'm opening one for GlusterFS, seems like a perfect partner.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1495
Yes, Emmanuel and I are hoping to have a discussion about this on Monday
afternoon during JUDCon. You're welcome to join in. :)
--
Manik
On 27 October 2011 18:59, Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org wrote:
On 27 Oct 2011, at 18:25, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
I'm opening one for GlusterFS, seems like a perfect partner.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1495
Yes, Emmanuel and I are hoping to have a discussion about this on Monday
20 matches
Mail list logo
