Re: [infinispan-dev] DIST.retrieveFromRemoteSource

2012-02-05 Thread Dan Berindei
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote: No, Socket.send() is not a hotspot in the Java code. On the networking level, with UDP datagrams, a packet is placed into a buffer and send() returns after the packet has been placed into the buffer successfully. Some network

Re: [infinispan-dev] again: no physical address

2012-02-05 Thread Bela Ban
On 2/4/12 5:53 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: On 2 Feb 2012, at 07:53, Bela Ban wrote: I can also reproduce it by now, in JGroups: I simply create 12 members in a loop... Don't need the bombastic Transactional test Yup; Transactional was made to benchmark and profile 2-phase transactions -

Re: [infinispan-dev] DIST.retrieveFromRemoteSource

2012-02-05 Thread Bela Ban
On 2/5/12 9:44 AM, Dan Berindei wrote: On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Bela Banb...@redhat.com wrote: No, Socket.send() is not a hotspot in the Java code. On the networking level, with UDP datagrams, a packet is placed into a buffer and send() returns after the packet has been placed into

Re: [infinispan-dev] Proposal: ISPN-1394 Manual rehashing in 5.2

2012-02-05 Thread Dan Berindei
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org wrote: On 1 Feb 2012, at 12:23, Dan Berindei wrote: Bela, you're right, this is essentially what we talked about in Lisbon: https://community.jboss.org/wiki/AsymmetricCachesAndManualRehashingDesign For joins I actually started

Re: [infinispan-dev] DIST.retrieveFromRemoteSource

2012-02-05 Thread Dan Berindei
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote: On 2/5/12 9:44 AM, Dan Berindei wrote: On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Bela Banb...@redhat.com  wrote: No, Socket.send() is not a hotspot in the Java code. On the networking level, with UDP datagrams, a packet is placed into a

Re: [infinispan-dev] DIST.retrieveFromRemoteSource

2012-02-05 Thread Dan Berindei
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Bela Ban b...@redhat.com wrote: On 2/5/12 4:40 PM, Dan Berindei wrote: Remember that a message might be retransmitted, so it is placed into a retransmit buffer. If M1 has destination A and M2 has destination B, and we send M1 first (to A), then change M1's

Re: [infinispan-dev] Proposal: ISPN-1394 Manual rehashing in 5.2

2012-02-05 Thread Manik Surtani
On 5 Feb 2012, at 16:24, Dan Berindei wrote: On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org wrote: On 1 Feb 2012, at 12:23, Dan Berindei wrote: Bela, you're right, this is essentially what we talked about in Lisbon:

Re: [infinispan-dev] Proposal: ISPN-1394 Manual rehashing in 5.2

2012-02-05 Thread Dan Berindei
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org wrote: On 5 Feb 2012, at 16:24, Dan Berindei wrote: On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org wrote: On 1 Feb 2012, at 12:23, Dan Berindei wrote: Bela, you're right, this is essentially what we talked about