[infinispan-dev] Atomic Objects on top of Infinispan

2013-08-19 Thread Pierre Sutra
Hello, As part of the LEADS project (http://www.leads-project.eu), I implemented a factory of atomic objects on top of Infinispan. The code is available in the classes AtomicObject*.java stored in the directory https://github.com/otrack/Leads-infinispan/tree/master/core/src/main/java/org/infinispa

Re: [infinispan-dev] Eventual Consistency in Infinispan

2013-08-19 Thread Faseela K
Hi Tristan, I was just comparing the performance of synchronous transactional and synchronous non-transactional writes in replication mode. And I see, transactional writes were taking lesser time, than non-transactional. Is it expected behaviour? My transactional config has the following

Re: [infinispan-dev] cache loader/preload

2013-08-19 Thread Sanne Grinovero
On 19 August 2013 11:02, Pedro Ruivo wrote: > > > On 08/16/2013 07:51 PM, Ray Tsang wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Galder ZamarreƱo > > wrote: >> >> >> On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:25 AM, Ray Tsang > > wrote: >> >> > Btw

Re: [infinispan-dev] Eventual Consistency in Infinispan

2013-08-19 Thread Tristan Tarrant
Infinispan does not implement eventual consistency yet. Tristan On 08/19/2013 02:39 PM, Faseela K wrote: > Hi, >I am using Infinispan - 5.3.0 in clustering mode. >I have a transactional configuration, in replication-synchronous mode. >I want to know, whether eventual consistency is su

[infinispan-dev] Eventual Consistency in Infinispan

2013-08-19 Thread Faseela K
Hi, I am using Infinispan - 5.3.0 in clustering mode. I have a transactional configuration, in replication-synchronous mode. I want to know, whether eventual consistency is supported for synchronous replication in 5.3. Could someone please brief how eventual consistency works in infin

Re: [infinispan-dev] cache loader/preload

2013-08-19 Thread Pedro Ruivo
On 08/16/2013 07:51 PM, Ray Tsang wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Galder ZamarreƱo > wrote: > > > On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:25 AM, Ray Tsang > wrote: > > > Btw how do we deal with preloading in a cluster? > > Each