Hi Sanne
Reading your reply I realized I was wrong in my evaluation, we could
require the user to specify the secure cache(s) he wants to query when
building the query and checking that he has read rights on all of them
before executing the query, just like a DB would do. And if he doesn't
On 27 February 2014 10:54, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sanne
Reading your reply I realized I was wrong in my evaluation, we could
require the user to specify the secure cache(s) he wants to query when
building the query and checking that he has read rights on all of them
Hi,
Recently we had an email thread on Map/Reduce and Hadoop’s API/mechanisms to do
Map/Reduce.
I’ve just finished watching [1], which looks at Hadoop’s Java API and then
looks at evolutions, improvements that functional programming have enabled.
Some food for thought :)
Cheers,
[1]
Hmm very good points Sanne. Yeah I think we can have a contract that
returns an Address were task was executed.
Cheers,
Vladimir
On 2/26/2014, 4:25 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
I'm a bit skeptical.
It might sound a sensible request currently, but if you do so you
inherently promise that tasks
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic vblag...@redhat.com wrote:
Hmm very good points Sanne. Yeah I think we can have a contract that
returns an Address were task was executed.
Cheers,
Vladimir
On 2/26/2014, 4:25 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
I'm a bit skeptical.
It might
On 27 February 2014 16:58, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic vblag...@redhat.com wrote:
Hmm very good points Sanne. Yeah I think we can have a contract that
returns an Address were task was executed.
Cheers,
Vladimir
On 2/26/2014,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.orgwrote:
On 27 February 2014 16:58, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic vblag...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hmm very good points Sanne. Yeah I think we can have a contract that
On 27 February 2014 18:40, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org
wrote:
On 27 February 2014 16:58, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic vblag...@redhat.com
Hi guys.
Why's the git repo over 100MB in size for a fresh checkout? Most of this
seems to be consumed by git objects:
~/Code/infinispan/.git GIT_DIR! pwd
/Users/manik/Code/infinispan/.git
~/Code/infinispan/.git GIT_DIR! du -hs .
54M .
Perhaps we added some large files at some point and
