Hi,
hibernate-hql-parser and hibernate-hql-lucene do not have a Final
release yet, so at this moment it is not possible to avoid the alpha
dependency.
Cheers
On 03/17/2014 01:57 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
Hi all,
I was working on extending camel-infinispan component with remote
query
On 15/03/2014 03:11, cotton-ben wrote:
We are of course very newbie wrt to ISPN7 DataContainer internals. Before
we get into building and testing compelling exercises and hardening the
OffHeapDefaultDataContainer, would you please comment wrt to your view that
this seems like the correct
Hello Infinispan Dev Team,
After several days of testing and research with Sanne Grinovero, he asked
me to send an email to this mailing list to expose you my issue with I
nfinispan.
I'm actually working on a project to build an infinispan cluster with the
following requirement:
-
Many thanks for this counsel, Tristan. Dmitry and I are taking our first
baby steps into learning the DataContainer internals.
We will exercise this consideration that you mention - and exercise it
explicitly - to ensure our adaptation is accommodating.
In general, our approach to adapting
Tristan, Does the ISPN7 API (or config) have a FluentBuilder mechanism via
which Cache instance A can be bound to DataContainer A and Cache instance B
can be bound to DataContainer B? Thx, Ben Dmitry
--
View this message in context:
On 17/03/2014 13:14, cotton-ben wrote:
Tristan, Does the ISPN7 API (or config) have a FluentBuilder mechanism via
which Cache instance A can be bound to DataContainer A and Cache instance B
can be bound to DataContainer B? Thx, Ben Dmitry
you would do
ConfigurationBuilder a = new
While working on ISPN-4068 to add the current state to listeners that
were added I found that what I essentially needed was a way to iterate
over the entries of the cache. I am thinking of adding this to the
public API available on the AdvancedCache interface.
I wanted to get your guy's opinions
Why listeners are not invoked? JCache iterator() notifies the listeners.
Can the iterator remove entries?
I assume there's no ordering guarantee, but behaviour under concurrent
changes would be rather tricky. I don't like the idea of iterating over
changing structure.
If you need to iterate
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Radim Vansa rva...@redhat.com wrote:
Why listeners are not invoked? JCache iterator() notifies the listeners.
Like I mentioned this can be changed. However, I have not seen a
cache entry visitor listener in JCache. The only listeners I am aware
of are for
Got it now.
That being said, if Alan is correct (one JVM per M/R task run per node), we
will need to implement C/S local key and keyset lookup.
Emmanuel
On 14 Mar 2014, at 12:34, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
On 14 March 2014 09:06, Emmanuel Bernard emman...@hibernate.org wrote:
For Map/Reduce v1 this is definitely the case:
https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r1.2.1/mapred_tutorial.html#Task+Execution+%26+Environment
The TaskTracker executes the Mapper / Reducer task as a child process in a
separate jvm.
I believe this is also the case for Map/Reduce v2, but I
Yes, the M/R v1 by default launches one *new* JVM per task, so during the
execution of a certain Job, at a given moment in a node there could be
dozens of JVMs running in parallel, that will be destroyed when the task
(map or reduce) finishes. It is possible to instruct the map reduce system
to
Well that’s only a guestimate but if I had to put a number, this approach is
going to be shit slow +- 10% compared to what Infinispan M/R does (despite all
of its limitations).
We can do the proto but at some stage we might want to take over and replace
some of that JVM spawn logic. Especially
I do realize you need such a feature, still as I pointed out when we
first drafted it I'm skeptical because of the complexities you
mention.
It highly depends on what use cases we want to address, but as a
general purpose solution I think this initial state received by the
clients needs to be
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
I do realize you need such a feature, still as I pointed out when we
first drafted it I'm skeptical because of the complexities you
mention.
It highly depends on what use cases we want to address, but as a
general
15 matches
Mail list logo
