On 30 Apr 2014, at 16:31, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
Valid concerns, but I think we should split those in two very
different categories:
1- we provide testing utilities which are quite useful to other people too
2- we run unit tests on our own code to prevent regressions
This list is for discussions of development of Infinispan.
For user questions, please post them in
https://community.jboss.org/en/infinispan/content?filterID=contentstatus%5Bpublished%5D~objecttype~objecttype%5Bthread%5D
For this particular issue, I have not seen such exception since 5.2, and
On 22 Apr 2014, at 17:19, Radim Vansa rva...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/22/2014 03:58 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 17 Apr 2014, at 08:03, Radim Vansa
rva...@redhat.com
wrote:
On
Hi Pedro,
Your turn for release now :-)
There's plenty of stuff pending, but when we'll have at least:
[1] ISPN-4222 Add support for distributed entry iterator
and
[2] ISPN-3917 Filter objects using the query DSL (without using an index) I
think we should proceed with the release.
I know Will
Hi, Roger that :)
Pedro
On 05/09/2014 12:12 AM, Mircea Markus wrote:
Hi Pedro,
Your turn for release now :-)
There's plenty of stuff pending, but when we'll have at least:
[1] ISPN-4222 Add support for distributed entry iterator
and
[2] ISPN-3917 Filter objects using the query DSL
