Hi,
recently I've stumbled upon one already expected behaviour (one instance
is [1]), but which did not got much attention.
In non-tx cache, when the primary owner fails after the request has been
replicated to backup owner, the request is retried in the new topology.
Then, the operation is
Thanks Sanne for getting this up and running, and thanks Tomas for the
excellent work with the OData server!
Looking forward to seeing how Cakery works :)
Cheers,
On 06 May 2014, at 13:35, Sanne Grinovero sa...@infinispan.org wrote:
Hi all, that looks great!
freshly created:
-
Radim, I would contend that the first and foremost guarantee that put()
makes is to leave the cache in a consistent state. So we can't just throw
an exception and give up, leaving k=v on one owner and k=null on another.
Secondly, put(k, v) being atomic means that it either succeeds, it writes
k=v
I don't think we are in a position to decide what is a reasonable
compromise; we can do better.
For example - as Radim suggested - it might seem reasonable to have
the older value around for a little while. We'll need a little bit of
history of values and tombstones anyway for many other reasons.
Hi all,
I'm unable to run the Infinispan testsuite because of OOM exceptions
hapening in the testsuite of Infinispan REST CacheStore.
Anyone else has seen the same problem?
Cheers,
Sanne
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
@Dan: It's absolutely correct to do the further writes in order to make
the cache consistent, I am not arguing against that. You've fixed the
outcome (state of cache) well. My point was that we should let the user
know that the value he gets is not 100% correct when we already know
that - and
Now that finally Infinispan moved to build (and require) Java7, I'm
preparing to upgrade the Lucene Directory to Apache Lucene 4.8.
Sometimes it's trivial, some others we're out of luck and this is one
of such situations: the new Lucene code expects some new methods to
create and validate a CRC32
I am not sure I understand everything you said. how about you take 20 mins
tomorrow during our Hibernate NoORM team meeting on IRC?
Be careful, 20 mins run fast in practice :)
On 12 May 2014, at 17:38, Sanne Grinovero sa...@hibernate.org wrote:
Now that finally Infinispan moved to build (and
Hi,
I think you mentioned having created the roadmap page but I can't find
it, and people keep asking about it so I'm probably not the only one
not finding it:
https://community.jboss.org/message/870798
Could we make it more visible on the website?
Cheers,
Sanne
On 25 February 2014 17:09,
