On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:53 PM, William Burns mudokon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Radim Vansa rva...@redhat.com wrote:
Users expect that size() will be constant-time (or linear to
Hi Galder,
Early Access build for JDK 9 b33 https://jdk9.java.net/download/ is
available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here
http://www.java.net/download/jdk9/changes/jdk9-b33.html
Early Access build for JDK 8u40 b09 http://jdk8.java.net/download.html
is available on java.net,
Pedro and I have been having discussions with the LEADS guys on their
experience of Map / Reduce especially around stability during topology changes.
This ties to the .size() thread you guys have been exchanging on (I only could
read it partially).
On the requirements, theirs is pretty
Actually this was something I was hoping to get to possibly in the near future.
I already have to do https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4358 which
will require rewriting parts of the distributed entry iterator. In
doing so I was planning on breaking this out to a more generic
framework where
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:40 PM, William Burns mudokon...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually this was something I was hoping to get to possibly in the near
future.
I already have to do https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4358 which
will require rewriting parts of the distributed entry iterator. In
On Oct 8, 2014, at 16:19, Radim Vansa rva...@redhat.com wrote:
Users expect that size() will be constant-time (or linear to cluster
size), and generally fast operation. I'd prefer to keep it that way.
Though, even the MR way (used for HotRod size() now) needs to crawl
through all the
On Oct 8, 2014, at 15:42, William Burns mudokon...@gmail.com wrote:
So it seems we would want to change this for 7.0 if possible since it
would be a bigger change for something like 7.1 and 8.0 would be even
further out. I should be able to put this together for CR2.
+1, plese go for it.
On Oct 8, 2014, at 15:57, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:42 PM, William Burns mudokon...@gmail.com wrote:
So it seems we would want to change this for 7.0 if possible since it
would be a bigger change for something like 7.1 and 8.0 would be even
further
On 10/09/2014 03:40 PM, William Burns wrote:
Actually this was something I was hoping to get to possibly in the near
future.
I already have to do https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4358 which
will require rewriting parts of the distributed entry iterator. In
doing so I was planning on
On 10/09/2014 04:41 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:40 PM, William Burns mudokon...@gmail.com
mailto:mudokon...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually this was something I was hoping to get to possibly in the
near future.
I already have to do
10 matches
Mail list logo
