I still think that if the cache is already defined, defineConfiguration
should throw an exception. This javadoc was written 7 years ago [1],
maybe with a different intention.
Strange and complex combinations don't help. We have made a clear
separation between templates and cache configurations;
http://blog.infinispan.org/2017/03/checking-infinispan-cluster-health-and.html
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
Hi,
the behaviour of HR authentication handler has changed recently [1]. Now, if
HR authentication is enabled, anonymous access over HR is disabled unless SASL
property NOANONYMOUS is set to false. While I agree that disabling anonymous
access by default is reasonable, on the other hand I find t
On 01/03/17 10:15, Vojtech Juranek wrote:
> Hi,
> the behaviour of HR authentication handler has changed recently [1]. Now, if
> HR authentication is enabled, anonymous access over HR is disabled unless SASL
> property NOANONYMOUS is set to false. While I agree that disabling anonymous
> access b
Hi
2017-02-28 22:51 GMT+01:00 William Burns :
> So while I was trying to work on this, I have to admit I am even more torn
> in regards to what to do. Looking at [1] it looks like the template
> should only be applied if the cache configuration is not currently
> defined. Unfortunately it does
On středa 1. března 2017 10:56:08 CET Tristan Tarrant wrote:
> I think that we need to make a clear distinction about authentication
> and authorization.
ok, I mixed these two together when I was thinking about it, you are right.
Thanks for reminder
vojta
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> I still think that if the cache is already defined, defineConfiguration
> should throw an exception. This javadoc was written 7 years ago [1],
> maybe with a different intention.
> Strange and complex combinations don't help. We have made a cle
On 01/03/17 13:01, Dan Berindei wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
>> I still think that if the cache is already defined, defineConfiguration
>> should throw an exception. This javadoc was written 7 years ago [1],
> I agree with throwing an exception in defineConfigurati
Alright seems fine to me.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, 9:27 AM Tristan Tarrant wrote:
> On 01/03/17 13:01, Dan Berindei wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> >> I still think that if the cache is already defined, defineConfiguration
> >> should throw an exception. This javado