[infinispan-dev] Branching 9.0.x

2017-04-11 Thread Tristan Tarrant
Hi all, I am going to branch 9.0.x tomorrow at 12:00 CEST. Let me know if I should delay this. Tristan -- Tristan Tarrant Infinispan Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat ___ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org

Re: [infinispan-dev] HotRod client TCK

2017-04-11 Thread Radim Vansa
Since these tests use real server(s), many of them test not only the client behaviour (generating correct commands according to the protocol), but server, too. While this is practical (we need to test server somehow, too), there's nothing all the tests across languages will have physically in

[infinispan-dev] HotRod client TCK

2017-04-11 Thread Martin Gencur
Hello all, we have been working on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7120. Anna has finished the first step from the JIRA - collecting information about tests in the Java HotRod client test suite (including server integration tests) and it is now prepared for wider review. She created a

Re: [infinispan-dev] Weekly IRC meeting logs 2017-04-10

2017-04-11 Thread Radim Vansa
I thought that 9.0 should have been branched off yesterday and master set to 9.1, what's the current plan (time-wise)? R. On 04/10/2017 08:47 PM, Tristan Tarrant wrote: > My activities: > > - Server restructuring proposal [1] > - ISPN-7712 Common Name role mapper case, PR @ [2] > - ISPN-7706 If

Re: [infinispan-dev] Streams & missing segments

2017-04-11 Thread Radim Vansa
Yes, I am trying to reuse those components and I've did only minor modifications so far. Without topology change that works. But I understand that you had some concept behind these components and I am looking for a natural extension. So, if I need to add waiting, is it acceptable to add