Hi,
See below
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 06:57, Galder Zamarreño gal...@jboss.org wrote:
On Dec 15, 2011, at 11:15 PM, Slorg1 wrote:
I am thinking of something evil and wonder what you think about that.
I am supposing the fail silently code + solution #3.
tx1
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:59, Mircea Markus mircea.mar...@jboss.com wrote:
1. tx2 read data1.
2. it performs a PFER with fails for some random reason. With the new
code you put in, that does not rollback the tx and continue as though
nothing happened.
it's not only with the new code,
does not make
sense and cannot be done right... maybe it just should not be (e.g.
implicit transactions).
I know you feel strongly about the implicit transactions.
Food for thought, I patched my version not to have them and I can tell
you it works great!
Good luck,
Regards,
Slorg1
On Tue, Dec 13
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:08, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 13, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Slorg1 wrote:
Hi,
I guess I will troll a little here but it seems to me that the
implicit transactions are the issue.
What Galder suggested does makes sense( that you would want
looking for such errors, and maybe others.
I am using 5.1.0 BETA 5 and when members are suspected I do not get
the exception.
Infinispan takes care of it for me.
Regards,
Slorg1
--
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email
Hi Galder,
Let me know if I can be of assistance in any ways.
Regards,
Slorg1
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 04:33, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey Slorg1,
I have not forgotten this thread by any means. I think you make some
interesting points which I need to look into more deeply
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:00, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
Hi,
Now that all the 5.1 major work is done I plan to run some benchmarks
comparing 5.1 with 5.0. It's not only tx stuff I'd like to compare, as some
other were
not
have them in hibernate 3.5.5.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:15, Mircea Markus mircea.mar...@jboss.com wrote:
On 29 Nov 2011, at 14:03, Slorg1 wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:00, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:
Hi,
Now
Hi,
O.K. so here is what I found out (this is linked with the thread
titled Re: [infinispan-dev] PutForExternalRead and autoCommit, a
copy of this message will be sent on it, though it does not close the
discussion on it).
First, let me remind everyone, that I am using:- Atomikos as a
transaction
or if I am not clear.
Thank you,
Regards,
Slorg1
--
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email ?
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
10 matches
Mail list logo
