On 28 Jun 2013, at 17:16, Radim Vansa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was playing with efficient ways to write to append-only log and I have some
> results below.
This sounds a lot like what the loggers do, might be worth looking at some
FileAppender impls for inspiration ;)
>
> I've used three impleme
- Original Message -
| From: "Galder Zamarreño"
| To: "infinispan -Dev List"
| Sent: Friday, July 5, 2013 7:46:03 AM
| Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Appending to file
|
|
| On Jul 3, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
|
| > | >
| > | > I&#x
On Jul 3, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> | >
> | > I've used three implementations: one simply synchronizing the access and
> | > calling force(false) after each write (by default 1kB). Second with
> | > threads cooperating - every thread puts its data into queue and waits for
> | > a
On Jul 3, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> | >
> | > I've used three implementations: one simply synchronizing the access and
> | > calling force(false) after each write (by default 1kB). Second with
> | > threads cooperating - every thread puts its data into queue and waits for
> | > a
| >
| > I've used three implementations: one simply synchronizing the access and
| > calling force(false) after each write (by default 1kB). Second with
| > threads cooperating - every thread puts its data into queue and waits for
| > a short period of time - if then its data are still in the queu
On Jun 28, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was playing with efficient ways to write to append-only log and I have some
> results below.
>
> I've used three implementations: one simply synchronizing the access and
> calling force(false) after each write (by default 1kB). Seco
