Sent from my iPhone
On 20 May 2013, at 12:58, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Manik Surtani msurt...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys
I'm working on an intermittent failure
On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys
I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and I
think I've come across what I think is underspecified behaviour in
AtomicHashMap.
Say we have two transactions, tx1 and tx2, and they
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Manik Surtani msurt...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys
I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and I
think I've come across what I think is underspecified behaviour
On 17 May 2013, at 07:35, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys
I'm working on an intermittent failure in
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On 17 May 2013, at 07:35, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Mircea Markus mmar...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com
Hi guys
I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and I
think I've come across what I think is underspecified behaviour in
AtomicHashMap.
Say we have two transactions, tx1 and tx2, and they both work with the same
atomic map in a pessimistic cache:
1. tx1: am1 =
On 16 May 2013, at 15:04, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys
I'm working on an intermittent failure in NodeMoveAPIPessimisticTest and I
think I've come across what I think is underspecified behaviour in
AtomicHashMap.
Say we have two transactions, tx1 and tx2, and they
