On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Radim Vansa wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> | From: "Dan Berindei"
> | To: "infinispan -Dev List"
> | Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:03:10 AM
> | Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] DefaultExecutorFactory an
- Original Message -
| From: "Dan Berindei"
| To: "infinispan -Dev List"
| Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:03:10 AM
| Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] DefaultExecutorFactory and rejection policy
|
| On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Radim Vansa < rva.
ey're not passed to the Infinispan
thread pool (at least for now).
> Radim
>
> - Original Message -
> | From: "Adrian Nistor"
> | To: "infinispan -Dev List"
> | Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 3:37:23 PM
> | Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Defa
sage -
| From: "Adrian Nistor"
| To: "infinispan -Dev List"
| Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 3:37:23 PM
| Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] DefaultExecutorFactory and rejection policy
|
| What about creating a RejectedExecutionHandler that blocks the
| calling
| thread if the thread
infinispan-dev-boun...@lists.jboss.org
>>> [mailto:infinispan-dev-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Pedro Ruivo
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:29 AM
>>> To: ispn-dev
>>> Subject: [infinispan-dev] DefaultExecutorFactory and rejection policy
>>>
>&
't be queued? In my mind, the benefits would
>> outweigh the unbounded nature of it.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: infinispan-dev-boun...@lists.jboss.org
>> [mailto:infinispan-dev-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Pedro Ruivo
>&
uld
> outweigh the unbounded nature of it.
>
> Erik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: infinispan-dev-boun...@lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:infinispan-dev-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Pedro Ruivo
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:29 AM
> To: ispn-dev
> Subj
013 9:29 AM
To: ispn-dev
Subject: [infinispan-dev] DefaultExecutorFactory and rejection policy
Hi
I'm working on ISPN-2808 (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2808) and I
noticed that the DefaultExecutorFactory is creating the executor service
with an Abortpolicy.
Is there any particular
Hi
I'm working on ISPN-2808 (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2808) and
I noticed that the DefaultExecutorFactory is creating the executor
service with an Abortpolicy.
Is there any particular reason for that?
In the new thread pool needed by ISPN-2808, I cannot have the messages
(i.e. the
