Reading, https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Cross+site+replication, 
I've spotted the following:

if CUSTOM failurePolicyClass requires a failurePolicyClass, it would have been 
wiser to do this type of configuration:

<backup>
        <customBackupFailurePolicy failurePolicyClass="x" />
</backup>
--
<backup>
        <warnBackupFailurePolicy />
</backup>
…etc

Having failurePolicyClass as a property of backup that's optional but required 
when backupFailurePolicy="CUSTOM" is clunky IMO.

WDYT?

Cheers,
--
Galder Zamarreño
gal...@redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz

Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io

Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org


_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to