Reading, https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Cross+site+replication, I've spotted the following:
if CUSTOM failurePolicyClass requires a failurePolicyClass, it would have been wiser to do this type of configuration: <backup> <customBackupFailurePolicy failurePolicyClass="x" /> </backup> -- <backup> <warnBackupFailurePolicy /> </backup> …etc Having failurePolicyClass as a property of backup that's optional but required when backupFailurePolicy="CUSTOM" is clunky IMO. WDYT? Cheers, -- Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com twitter.com/galderz Project Lead, Escalante http://escalante.io Engineer, Infinispan http://infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev