On Nov 2, 2012, at 7:08 PM, Dennis Reed der...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 12:45 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Ok, my suggestion below is working now, but I'm not so sure the way the
activation interceptor works is the correct one.
IMO, an activation, which involves removing an entry
Ok, my suggestion below is working now, but I'm not so sure the way the
activation interceptor works is the correct one.
IMO, an activation, which involves removing an entry from the cache store (and
updating the stats), should only be done when a cache entry has been retrieved
from the cache
On 11/02/2012 12:45 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
Ok, my suggestion below is working now, but I'm not so sure the way the
activation interceptor works is the correct one.
IMO, an activation, which involves removing an entry from the cache store
(and updating the stats), should only be done
On Oct 30, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2384
I've created a unit test in
https://github.com/galderz/infinispan/commit/01230d40df6f26720039986916c38de8be33b44b
That was the easy part :). How to fix it is
Hi all,
Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2384
I've created a unit test in
https://github.com/galderz/infinispan/commit/01230d40df6f26720039986916c38de8be33b44b
That was the easy part :). How to fix it is no so clear. In pseudo-code, the
race condition happens when:
1. T1. passivate
