Would it be possible to set up <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>? (And the obvious
alias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> too, I guess?)
Recently, many inhabitants of [EMAIL PROTECTED] have noticed that a
clear division of interest is arising, between people seeking help
using CVS, and people seeking to discuss CVS design
On Friday, March 10, 2000 11:33 AM, Karen Baldwin
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Hi; just discovered this group. Help!
> I have a question very similar to that first asked within this thread.
>
> We've been using CVS exclusively on Solaris/Unix
> until now. We are now porting to NT. We inte
Hi folks,
Thanks, Greg, for your reply.
On 9 Mar 00, at 11:46, the Illustrious Greg W. Moore wrote:
> Paul,
> Since it appears that no one has responded yet I'll tell you what
> I've learned after a similar fail attempt. Just for the record my
> setup is similar wincvs 1.1b8 on NT4.0 SP
It is described in the manual under "cvs checkout" and other places. You need
to know the date or revision number of the file revision you wish to retrieve.
Try something like:
cvs checkout -r 1.13 file.c# retrieve
revision 1.13 of the file
cvs checkout
Try something like
cvs checkout -D "2000-02-28 14:14" myModule ...
Note that times in CVS are ALWAYS in UTC.
Alan Thompson
"Ariela Orian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/09/2000 10:33:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Alan Thompson/Orincon)
Subject: checking out by date
Hi
W
At 3:16 PM -0600 3/9/00, Steele Kennett wrote:
>I had a working file in the repository. The client said that he
>wanted it to look a totally different way. So i changed it and then
>committed it again. Now the client says he liked it the way it was
>before! How do i get that file back?
Assumin
Steele Kennett writes:
>
> I had a working file in the repository. The client said that he wanted it to
> look a totally different way. So i changed it and then committed it again.
> Now the client says he liked it the way it was before! How do i get that
> file back?
Find out what revision of t
Steele Kennett wrote
>
>I had a working file in the repository. The client said that he
wanted it to
>look a totally different way. So i changed it and then committed it
again.
>Now the client says he liked it the way it was before! How do i get
that
>file back?
>
>please help.
It is possible
[smc] [snip]
[smc] [..regarding "cvs update -j rev1 -j rev2 myfile.c" ]
> >
> > rev1 and rev2 can be arbitrary revisions. (Well, with the
> > restriction
> > that they must already be in the same repository...which is
> > the main difference I see fro
> From: Shandy Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 11:41 AM
> well, i think we still need another list with public write
> access to seperate
> information about USING cvs from information about AUTHORING cvs.
I'd like that, too. That's what I really need, and what
Hi; just discovered this group. Help!
I have a question very similar to that first asked within this thread.
We've been using CVS exclusively on Solaris/Unix
until now. We are now porting to NT. We intend to have a single source
repository on a Solaris machine, which will be accessed by user
Noel L Yap wrote:
>
> >I
> >don't have a clue as to what -j should do in combination with -C.
>
> It seems you've been more thorough than I have. Looking at it another way, "cvs
> up -C file" should be equivalent to "cvs up -p -r file >file". If
> other flags (eg "-j") were specified, the co
(subject has been renamed slightly.)
"Cameron, Steve" wrote:
> Tobias Weingartner wrote:
> > I wrote
> > > How about this compromise: A CVS command to walk the local sandbox, find
> > > all the patch reject files, and mark conflicts properly? (With an option
> > to
> > > clean up the patch output
The only date format I have ever gotten to work is 'nnn hours ago'.
Ariela Orian wrote:
>
> Hi
> We're trying to check-out a tree according to date.
> We're following the instructions in the manual, and for some reason we
> fail.
> Can we get (very) specific information as to what the date forma
I had a working file
in the repository. The client said that he wanted it to look a totally different
way. So i changed it and then committed it again. Now the client says he liked
it the way it was before! How do i get that file back?
please
help.
Steele
Is it possible to rename a branch tag? We have been developing new
features on a brach, called rel-2_4, while just performing bug fixes
on the head. I am in the process of merging this branch to the head.
I have created another branch from the current head called rel-2_3 so
that we can cont
> Jesse Mahoney
> Design Automation/Chip Integration
> WCCG - INTEL
> phone: (512) 314-0147
> text pager: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
Ariela Orian writes:
>
> We're trying to check-out a tree according to date.
> We're following the instructions in the manual, and for some reason we
> fail.
> Can we get (very) specific information as to what the date format
> should be.
The ISO standard date/time format should always work:
Paul,
Since it appears that no one has responded yet I'll tell you what I've
learned after a similar fail attempt. Just for the record my setup is
similar wincvs 1.1b8 on NT4.0 SP 5. On the Unix Side the repository resides
on a Solaris 2.6 box
At 07:35 PM 3/6/00 -0800, Paul Garceau wrote:
>Gre
"Cameron, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Essentially anyone may read the messages sent to
> devel-cvs but only those who are able to
> commit to the CVS repository containng the CVS source
> may post messages there, according to DEVEL-CVS
>
> I, for example, subscribe to that list but can
At least two postings have a nasty virus on this news group. Those are
19916 and 19915. So be careful,,,
well, i think we still need another list with public write access to seperate
information about USING cvs from information about AUTHORING cvs.
-shandy
On Thu, 09 Mar 2000, Cameron, Steve wrote:
> That list ("devel-cvs") already exists, sort of.
>
> Read the file DEVEL-CVS from the cvs sources.
Hi
We're trying to check-out a tree according to date.
We're following the instructions in the manual, and for some reason we
fail.
Can we get (very) specific information as to what the date format
should be.
Thanks,
Ariela
Richard Wesley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>At 19:48 -0500 3/8/00, Sean Levy wrote:
[snip]
>>I'm now trying to set up a reasonable development environment under
>>MacOS 9. I've got XEmacs and MPW, and grabbed MacCvs. I have
>>both niftytelnet and F-Secure ssh clients. I cannot figure out
>>how
I wrote:
> That list ("devel-cvs") already exists, sort of.
>
> Read the file DEVEL-CVS from the cvs sources.
[smc] And reading this DEVEL-CVS file a bit myself,
now I see this:
"These topics should either go on info-cvs,
or have a new mailing list created for
At 19:48 -0500 3/8/00, Sean Levy wrote:
>I'm a long-time cvs user, and have used it on just about every Unix known
>to man. My standard modus operandi is cvs over ssh, since I keep my
>repositories on a machine that only allows ssh connections, and generally
>from somewhere behind a firewall.
>
>
That list ("devel-cvs") already exists, sort of.
Read the file DEVEL-CVS from the cvs sources.
(it mentions "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"...I don't know
if that still works...)
Essentially anyone may read the messages sent to
devel-cvs but only those who are able to
commit to the CVS repository contain
Benjamin B. Thomas writes:
>
> I found a workaround for the segfaults I got when using CVS over ssh and
> kerberized rsh. In the config file, PreservePermissions had been enabled. When I
> disabled it, everything worked normally. With it enabled, I could commit one
> file at a time, but got segfa
Noel L Yap writes [quoting me quoting him]:
>
> >> It seems you've been more thorough than I have. Looking at it another way,
> "cvs
> >> up -C file" should be equivalent to "cvs up -p -r file >file".
> If
> >> other flags (eg "-j") were specified, the command should be equivalent to
> "cvs
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:27:12 PM
>[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 09:39:03 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>> What if the
>> final lines were "cvs add" instead of "cvs add file"?
>
>Now that's a good questio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 03:18:04 PM
>> >Even still, what's wrong with an 'all-in-one' to add something to the module
>> >file as well? (or are you of the 'if it can be in a script, it mustn't be in
>> >the regular program' camp?)
>>
>> I know I'm in the 'if it can be in a script, it mu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:24:19 PM
>> It seems you've been more thorough than I have. Looking at it another way,
"cvs
>> up -C file" should be equivalent to "cvs up -p -r file >file".
If
>> other flags (eg "-j") were specified, the command should be equivalent to
"cvs
>> up -p -r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:23:10 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 09:47:39 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: R
Tobias Weingartner wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 7, Michael Gersten wrote:
[smc] [..snip..]
> > The current CVS update/commit, without built-in support for flying fish,
> > does not support that middle step: track changes to it.
>
> Ahh, I think you need to look into tags. One place I w
Good idea
Hey everybody.
What do people think about the idea of creating a new list for CVS development?
I personally am tired of the daily deluge of design-related rants and feature
requests in my mail box. I am interested in using the cvs program and
administering a cvs system.
Anybody support this
I found a workaround for the segfaults I got when using CVS over ssh and
kerberized rsh. In the config file, PreservePermissions had been enabled. When I
disabled it, everything worked normally. With it enabled, I could commit one
file at a time, but got segfaults any time multiple files were com
Hi out there,
Is it possible to see at what time the command
'cvs tag' was executed and by whom?
with kind regards,
Herman PoolRotaform /
Database Servicestel: 0320 - 286436
I have been battling periodically to try to install WinCVS on my home
machine (Win95) but consistantly fail to get past the installation hurdle.
Note this is after successfully installing on my Windows98 Machine in the
office.
The beta of WinCVS 1.11 gave exactly the same results as 1.06. I have
a
39 matches
Mail list logo
