-Original Message-
From: Duncan Kinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So it would work for html?
Oh Yes :)
I've been at a site where they used it for MS Word Docs
as well. The CVS Admin once in a while went ahead and
removed revisions from the files, just to make the
repository not
You should find the information you are seeking at www.cvshome.org
CVS Manual: Version Management with CVS, by Per Cederqvist -
http://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/index.html -
Open Source Development with CVS, by Karl Fogel -
http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/ -
-Thomas
-Original Message-
Hi all,
I got a little time to think about the problem of generated
files in the CVS archive (viz. the "contrib" branch).
The files were removed from the main GCC hierarchy on the theory that
it is a pain to maintain them and most developers have the relevant
tools. The problem arises when
"Bruce" == Bruce Korb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce *that* special? That renders #3 (and #2) completely
Bruce impossible. Unless you implement a Truely Ugly Hack.
I believe the standard hack is something like this, which we use on
x86-64.org in `loginfo':
^x86-64-ABI
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 09:31:37 -0700
From: Bruce Korb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3. The CVS commitinfo file works a little better, but has interesting
problems, too. See below.
So, of these, #3 has the most pleasing promise. But, there are problems..
I think you can solve the problem my
Title:
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
First Annual Linux Users' Training Conference
And
Awards Presentation
New Enterprise Solutions Through
Linux
October 30, 2000
Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade
