Build system with CVS

2001-03-24 Thread Jakob Hummes
Hi, I need to test several builds with CVS. Several developers have programmed new versions of their components, consisting of multiple source files in multiple directories. We have a tag "test_tag" that identifies the latest stable version of all files. Now, I want to test the new versions,

Re: cvs -R (was: Rename atomicity)

2001-03-24 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 20:39 -0500, Eric Siegerman wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 11:24:19PM +0100, Assar Westerlund wrote: What the patch below does is introduce an option (`-R') for running without creating any lock-files. This would let any user subvert CVS locking in the

Re: cvs -R (was: Rename atomicity)

2001-03-24 Thread Larry Jones
Gerhard Sittig writes: So it boils down to the question of "does the patch eliminate locking or does it consider the repo to be read only?" -- apparently there's quite a difference between these POVs ... Assar's patch just eliminates locking at the user's(!) request, which is so incredibly

Re: Tag not logged.

2001-03-24 Thread Larry Jones
Grigoriy Kuznetsov writes: I'v stumbled upon some weird thing. When I tag some file with 'tag -b' it doesn't get logged into history file, is it the way things should be ? Yes. CVS only logs rtag, not tag. -Larry Jones Pitiful. Just pitiful. -- Calvin

Re: RH 7.0, cvs pserver not working

2001-03-24 Thread Larry Jones
Ginger Ellsworth writes: $ cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs login (Logging in to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) CVS password: cvs [login aborted]: connect to 192.168.1.134:2401 failed: Connection refused "Connection refused" means that the server machine isn't listening for connections on the

Re: can't login via pserver and therefore can't save ~/.cvspass file

2001-03-24 Thread Larry Jones
Joe Kaiping writes: CVSROOT=:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr1/cvs CVS_RSH=ssh When I try to create a ~/.cvspass on the client with the following command it hangs after I type in my CVS password. Unix prompt-cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr1/cvs login (Logging in to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: can't login via pserver and therefore can't save ~/.cvspass file

2001-03-24 Thread Joe Kaiping
Joe Kaiping writes: CVSROOT=:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr1/cvs CVS_RSH=ssh When I try to create a ~/.cvspass on the client with the following command it hangs after I type in my CVS password. Unix prompt-cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr1/cvs login (Logging in to [EMAIL

Re: Why the split for rcvs?

2001-03-24 Thread Jerzy Kaczorowski
Dear CVS developers, I am watching the thread of "split for rcvs" and "locking and other patches" and I must say that I am quite shocked. Why is that the requirements for sending the patches are getting more hard every day? The conditions to accept the patches are quite too difficult to comply

Re: Build system with CVS

2001-03-24 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Saturday, March 24, 2001 at 12:05:04 (+0100), Jakob Hummes wrote: ] Subject: Build system with CVS We have a tag "test_tag" that identifies the latest stable version of all files. Now, I want to test the new versions, but seperately. For this, all developers have tagged all files of

Re: Why the split for rcvs?

2001-03-24 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Sunday, March 25, 2001 at 03:18:20 (+0800), Jerzy Kaczorowski wrote: ] Subject: Re: Why the split for rcvs? Dear CVS developers, please give Noel a chance and better CVS to us all... The problem is that there is no CVS developer. There are a few people with commit access who are more

RE: RH 7.0, cvs pserver not working

2001-03-24 Thread Joshua Davis
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Jones Ginger Ellsworth writes: $ cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs login (Logging in to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) CVS password: cvs [login aborted]: connect to 192.168.1.134:2401 failed:

Re: RH 7.0, cvs pserver not working

2001-03-24 Thread Larry Jones
Joshua Davis writes: I tried *not* setting HOME, but it didn't work on RH 7.0. The HOME setting seems to fix this problem (with RH 7.0 xinetd). Unless this behavior of RH 7.0 has been fixed. If that's the case, then 'nevermind'. :) What do you mean by "didn't work"? It may well be that