On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, krishna rama wrote:
kr> I was run this command "cvs -d
kr>:pserver:prasadm@tsl:/usr/local/newrepos login".Before
kr>run this command I was set all instructions whatever
kr>mentioned in the documentation.we geting an error
kr>"connection refused.".After that I was fou
[ On , July 14, 2001 at 22:07:00 (+0200), Garvin Hicking wrote: ]
> Subject: Problem with multiple merges from trunk to tree (and much more. :-)
>
> [1] Requirements:
> * Maintain a development line, and a final line
> * Easy to export the production version of the project via a never-
>chan
[ On Saturday, July 14, 2001 at 14:34:42 (-0700), Mike Castle wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: How well does CVS handle other types of data?
>
> What bug?
>
> CVS used to scan the contents of the conflict file to see if it had been
> fixed. But that was changed to the current method. Do you consider tha
[ On Saturday, July 14, 2001 at 13:25:37 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ]
> Subject: Disallowing commits in presence of conflict markers
>
> But my question remains: "What if the language provides no way to
> do this?" Given this context, you have a file that simply cannot be
> version-controlled b
Basically, my changes to the script fixed the part that was breaking on my
archives, but the changes broke other parts (including this one.) I can fix
it OK, but I hate working on code whose purpose I don't understand.
Thanks for the replys,
Jim
> But then, why expend all this extra effort to
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 03:48:25PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Saturday, July 14, 2001 at 11:52:48 (-0700), Mike Castle wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: How well does CVS handle other types of data?
> >
> > Except that CVS doesn't continue to detect conflicts. A simple touch(1) of
> > the file is
Hi!
(Warning: Detailed Vehicle Ahead - skip all ">" and "|"-lines or proceed
to the last 10 lines of my posting, if this is too much overhead for you.
And, this is a so-to-say addon for ony of my previous posting 'how to
structure my project?' :-)
I'm having difficulties tagging files an
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[ On Saturday, July 14, 2001 at 01:28:12 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: How well does CVS handle other types of data?
>>
>> And just how is this done? Do you use artifacts of the programming language
>> to somehow format the marker into
[ On Saturday, July 14, 2001 at 11:52:48 (-0700), Mike Castle wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: How well does CVS handle other types of data?
>
> Except that CVS doesn't continue to detect conflicts. A simple touch(1) of
> the file is sufficient to mark the file as "fixed." And that will work on
> any fil
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 02:07:58PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > The existing warning of a conflict during the merge is sufficient to
> > alert the user to a possible problem.
>
> No, it is not. The initial warning is only just that -- an initial
> warning. CVS must now continue to detect tha
[ On Friday, July 13, 2001 at 21:19:06 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: How well does CVS handle other types of data?
>
> The existing CVS user model can be maintained without change, even if the
> merge tool is swapped out with another, such as the trivial selection I
> suggested.
Yo
[ On Saturday, July 14, 2001 at 01:28:12 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: How well does CVS handle other types of data?
>
> And just how is this done? Do you use artifacts of the programming language
> to somehow format the marker into something that is not detectable by CVS?
> What i
Eric & Rajesh,
thanks for the reply. Here are some of my reasons for abusing CVS ;-).
What I'd like to be able to do is pull a branch off of the trunk, or another
branch, at some stable point (MYLABEL) and start working. I may be on this
branch for a while and would like to keep up with the trun
Can someone add
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=422733&group_id=4680&atid=304680
to this page, please? This patch originated from the work done by Eric Griswold
and Jim Kingdon but without any of the shortcomings.
Thanks,
Noel
|+--->
|
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[ On Friday, July 13, 2001 at 20:19:13 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: How well does CVS handle other types of data?
>>
>> I hope your hack doesn't make it into the general distribution. The
>> comment makes total sense. The authors have
15 matches
Mail list logo