Last September I posted a patch that allows for the integration of new
merge tools based on file extension. It's alpha-quality code, but a
good demonstration that, despite what certain individuals have claimed,
the CVS design is robust enough to accommodate an extensible merge
mechanism. I b
When I started one project and setup my CVS, I included in my repository the
sources for GNU tar... I used the VENDOR (GNU) and VERSION (v1_13) tags when
importing the modules... and get on modifying those sources within the main
trunk...
Now I would like to add to that branch the changes include
Hello!
Is there any possibility to remove a branch completely from the
repository?
For example, if I branched off one version for testing a problem, which
turns out to be of no use and I am absolutely sure I won't need this
branch again.
TIA!
--
Cu,
Robert
__
--- Paul Tomsic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what's the ideal way to deploy CVS in a
> web-development context using Apache/Tomcat.
I've already given my opinion on this so I won't
elaborate more on it.
> How would a web-based implementation of CVS be
> different than a software build type CVS
>
Title: RE: synchronizing multiple CVS-repositories ?
As far as I understand CVSUP lets me get a copy of the whole source tree from a remote server. This will give me one version of every element (file). correct?
What I want is to be able to synchronize the complete repository betwee
Hi,
Thanks for the mail. My problem was that I had to have the same file name
even the case mattered. I solved it by removing the ,v entriesfor the files
in the Attic as well as the repository directory and re-added the file back
again.
Thanks
Vijay
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kesch
Thanks again, Noel.
Appreciate your thoughts.
This is my first role as a cvs-type admin, so I'm
slowly munging through just about every piece of
documentation that I can get a hold of.
Cheers,
Paul
--- Noel Yap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Paul Tomsic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what's
Ripalda-Marin, Miguel-Angel writes:
>
> When I started one project and setup my CVS, I included in my repository the
> sources for GNU tar... I used the VENDOR (GNU) and VERSION (v1_13) tags when
> importing the modules... and get on modifying those sources within the main
> trunk...
>
> Now I w
[ On Wednesday, June 5, 2002 at 11:54:07 (+0100), Ripalda-Marin, Miguel-Angel wrote: ]
> Subject: Tracking third party software
>
> Now I would like to add to that branch the changes included in a patch file
> developed by GNU... I would like to know is the things I have to do are
> these:
>
> 1.
I've had success making a cvsignore file work in a specific directory, by
placing the file in that directory, but I'm pretty sure that you should be
able to make an ignore file work globally
(i.e. block out all .bak files no matter how far down the tree structure).
I've tried the help files sugges
[ On Wednesday, June 5, 2002 at 07:07:00 (-0500), Schmidt Henning (BNS USA) wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: synchronizing multiple CVS-repositories ?
>
> As far as I understand CVSUP lets me get a copy of the whole source tree
> from a remote server. This will give me one version of every element (fi
--- Paul Tomsic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks again, Noel.
>
> Appreciate your thoughts.
>
> This is my first role as a cvs-type admin, so I'm
> slowly munging through just about every piece of
> documentation that I can get a hold of.
No problem.
I think it's important to remind oneself
Hi all,
I have a CVS folder which I don't want to be checkoutable (this has been
achieved simply by chmod the appropriate rights). However, it has a
subfolder which I do want people to be able to checkout/update from BUT not
being able to commit to. Is this possible to do?
I've tried using LockD
[ On Wednesday, June 5, 2002 at 10:37:57 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Tracking third party software
>
> 1. EXPORT the original sources (cvs export -rv1_13)
If you do that then it's critical to use "-ko", at least when managing
sources that include RCS keywords
There's also a pot
[ On Wednesday, June 5, 2002 at 10:37:57 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Tracking third party software
>
> 1. EXPORT the original sources (cvs export -rv1_13)
Hi,
What's the difference between checking-out the 'avendor' branch (with the
'arelease' tag) and then patching... and expo
Hi,
I work with CVS 1.11.
I would like to change the type of .dsp and .dsw files (Project files and
Workspaces of MSDEV) in my repository to binary, so that they can be used
with MSDEV even when checked-out on Linux.
The problem with that is that changing the type to binary (using "cvs admin
-kb
Using CVS 1.10 on Solaris
The team had been using RCS for a long time and did not see any problems.
Still I was concerned about our set-up as I am not sure if it is correctly NFS or not.
The other day I got:
"cvs [update aborted]: invalid change text in /home/cvsroot/src/foo,v"
I searched the ar
Unix cvs server (cvs 1.11.1p1) with the pserver access method
Unix (cvs 1.11.1p1) and WinCVS 1.2 clients.
Our shop is in the process of moving from VSS to cvs (yay!). I have a set of Java/jsp
programmers who share development in one
working directory. (They will not be convinced that sharing a
I've got an imported vendor branch, that I regularly update
with new vendor releases. Most files in the vendor's sources
are unmodified by me, so an import followed by an update
conveniently pulls me up to the latest vendor versions.
Of course, for any files that I've modified (and thus exist
19 matches
Mail list logo
