Hi all:
I met a problem, if I create many level directory in a project. I must
add every directory.
For example:
I create the following directory structure, the test.txt file is in
folder3. if I want to add test.txt to mypoject. I have to add folder1 the
first, and then add folder2, then a
I'm looking for access control alternatives for
the contrib tool cvs_acls, which is in
/usr/lib/cvs/contrib/cvs_acls.
How is your experience with cvs_acls?
Is it sufficiently fine grained?
Are there better scripts available?
If I understand cvs_acls correctly, it has at least
two drawbacks.
> From: George xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I met a problem, if I create many level directory in a
> project. I must
> add every directory.
>
> Does anyone know how to directly add text.txt file under the
> new folder ?
'cvs add' is not recursive. Read the manual for details.
If you're on Windows using WinCVS there is an excellent macro that can
perform recursive add for you.
Regards,
anders
> -Original Message-
> From: Riechers, Matthew W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 18. september 2002 14:02
> To: 'George xu'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Add
At 08:01 PM 9/17/2002, Adam Bregenzer wrote:
>AFIAK the issue is not with where the working copy is stored, as long as
>you are the only one accessing the working copy. The issue is where the
>repository is stored/accessed from.
That's correct. I misunderstood the original question and thought i
George xu writes:
>
>I create the following directory structure, the test.txt file is in
> folder3. if I want to add test.txt to mypoject. I have to add folder1 the
> first, and then add folder2, then add folder3, then add test.txt file.
[...]
> Does anyone know how to directly add text.txt f
Matthew Navarre writes:
>
> Did you pick that quote manually, or is your sigmonster just unnaturally
> perceptive? :)
Randomly selected Calvin and Hobbes quotes have a tendency to be much
more pointedly applicable than one would expect.
-Larry Jones
Moms and reason are like oil and water. --
Alan Dayley writes:
>
> 1. I have been told that the following setup will lead to corruption
> because of esoteric problems in SMB that CVS can bring out:
[client/server CVS with the working directory on a Samba share from the
CVS server machine]
That won't cause corruption, but lots of people
I'm trying to move a project from my VSS repository
to
CVS. This project has multipule sub-dirs but after
running the script it only created the first level
directory and not all the sub dirs. What am I
missing? I made sure I have vsions of rm and chmod
that support -R option. It did g
Frederic Brehm wrote:
> For performance reasons (I/O throughput during compiles and network
> traffic) you might want to put it on a local disk. Policy makers don't
> always understand performance issues, though.
It also helps to point out that there should be no need to backup the
sa
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:23:48AM -0700, Mike Ayers wrote:
> It also helps to point out that there should be no need to backup the
> sandbox directories.
Well, I wouldn't go that far, for precisely the reasons you
describe:
> This, however, requires that the developers be
> trained to p
I know whole directories can be excluded but is there any way to exclude on
a file-by-file basis within directory?
Jeanie
__
This is Linux country. On a quiet night, you can hear NT re-boot.
__
12 matches
Mail list logo
