RE: Commit inconsistency: Up-to-date check did not fail though itsho uld have !

2003-02-23 Thread Reinstein, Shlomo
Hi, I have ran the test with the repo local to the CVS server, and it shows the same behavior. Which brings me to the conclusion that the client/server protocol does not function as expected. Here's the scenario: (Can be done by the same user on the same machine) 1. Create the repository: cvs -d

RE: Commit inconsistency: Up-to-date check did not fail though itsho uld have !

2003-02-23 Thread Reinstein, Shlomo
This happened with 1.10.8 and also with 1.11.1p1. No related fix has been mentioned in the news file for CVS versions 1.12-1.15. Shlomo -Original Message- From: Guus Leeuw jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 12:07 PM To: Reinstein, Shlomo Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

modules confusion?

2003-02-23 Thread Michiel Meeuwissen
We have a CVS-repository with a modules basicly like this: # this will enable you to check out 'src' src -d src/org/mmbase mmbase # to check out everything all -d mmbase all src config html documentation It is possible to check out 'src' or 'all', or one of the other top-level directories

Re: modules confusion?

2003-02-23 Thread Larry Jones
Michiel Meeuwissen writes: Having checked out 'src' though, and doing a 'cvs update -d -P' in the src directory, all top-level directories are also added to src/org directory: That's the way it's always worked. CVS has no way to know whether a missing directory is missing because it is new

RE: Info-cvs Digest, Vol 3, Issue 36

2003-02-23 Thread Matthew Herrmann
Just do cvs up twice. The first time you'll get all the updates and messages whizzing by, the second time, only the conflicts and your changes will show up. HTH -Original Message- Date: 21 Feb 2003 07:55:55 -0500 From: Steven Tryon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: richard blair [EMAIL PROTECTED]