CVS patch for unedit -e

To enforce automatic procedure for controling changes I need as an administrator the possibility to remove somebody's edit. Unfortunately in version 1.11.6, we are using, option cvs unedit -e is not implemented. On info-cvs list I found, that there is a patch introducing it. I cannot find it

filename created independently by second party

Hello all. CVS 1.11 It's probably my fault - I was trying to do a final import to prepare for our version control strategy going live. What I didn't remember is that, with my developer's hat on, I had created some new files and done a cvs add in my local working copy. And to test those

Error commit_prep

Hi I have a little problem with cvs 1.11 in Suse Linux. When I have finished a commit, then it appears in my shell the next error messages: sh: commit_prep.in: command not found sh: log_accum.in: command not found But It seems that the commit runs fine.

Re: Error commit_prep

Juan D Dominguez Caravaca writes: I have a little problem with cvs 1.11 in Suse Linux. When I have finished a commit, then it appears in my shell the next error messages: sh: commit_prep.in: command not found sh: log_accum.in: command not found But It seems that the commit runs fine.

Re: filename created independently by second party

Andy Jones writes: So when I went to commit the files back in my local working copy I got filename created independantly by second party. I couldn't merge away the conflict. In the end I just cvs remove'd the version from the import. My question is, was there a better, cleaner way out

RE: filename created independently by second party

::slaps heel of hand to forehead:: That's what comes of being the CVS administrator *and* a programmer: I kept thinking it was a problem for administrator-me. Thank you. On Thursday, October 09, 2003 4:21 PM, Larry Jones [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andy Jones writes: So when I went to

Re: CVS patch for unedit -e

On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:42:40AM +0200, Krzysztof GORBIEL wrote: I have also tried to point my browser to the link attached in one of replies (dated 2001) but I got message: Permission: User Not Found: Only members of this project have permission to view this page (you are not listed as a

locking entire tree for write

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Correct me if I am wrong, but there is no good reason for the lock_tree_for_write calls in admin.c, edit.c, and watch.c. The three files contain four calls and all are of the form: ~lock_tree_for_write ~start_recursion(...CVS_LOCK_NONE...) ~

CVS and NFS: Questions

Regarding an NFS mounted repository: We have a Unix server (dev30) with cvs version 1.11 loaded on it that is NFS mounted to a disk that contains our repository ( /cvs ). THIS IS THE ONLY SERVER THAT MAKES AN NFS MOUNT TO THE DISK THAT CONTAINS OUR REPOSITORY. We did this for two reasons: 1)

Re: CVS patch for unedit -e

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Siegerman wrote: | cvshome.org, I believe anyone's allowed to join with read-only | |access. Approval is only required because the software they're |using to host the site won't let them turn off that feature. In |other words, if you're asking

Re: CVS and NFS: Questions

Richard Pfeiffer writes: We have a Unix server (dev30) with cvs version 1.11 loaded on it that is NFS mounted to a disk that contains our repository ( /cvs ). THIS IS THE ONLY SERVER THAT MAKES AN NFS MOUNT TO THE DISK THAT CONTAINS OUR REPOSITORY. [...] 1)Would these issues ONLY

Re: CVS and NFS: Questions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Pfeiffer wrote: |Regarding an NFS mounted repository: | |1)Would these issues ONLY occur in matters where |there was MORE THAN ONE server mounting the |repository over NFS (because then you are dealing |with the potential of locked files,

Re: filename created independently by second party

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Larry Jones wrote: | As far as CVS knows, the two file have nothing whatsoever to do with | |each other. Without a common ancestor, there's nothing to merge -- |you'd just have one big conflict with the entire contents of both files, |so there's no

Re: CVS and NFS: Questions

Derek Robert Price writes [about NFS-mounted repositories]: Many of the issues are related to locking. No, they're not. We've never had a report of a problem related to locking on NFS. CVS uses a successful mkdir(lockdir) to prevent other processes from creating locks. As I understand

Re: filename created independently by second party

Derek Robert Price writes: 1. The files are likely to have a similar base given the similar name, as has been the case nearly every time I have encountered this problem myself, and we might be able to work out something with merging... if the diff between the two files is under a certain

limit project size

howdy, is it possible to limit the maximum project size in some way, depending on the project, eg i create a project A and set the maximum size to NumberSoMuch1 and i create a project B and set the maximum size to NumberSoMuch2 any scripts? tnx,

Re: filename created independently by second party

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Larry Jones wrote: |Derek Robert Price writes: | |1. The files are likely to have a similar base given the similar name, |as has been the case nearly every time I have encountered this problem |myself, and we might be able to work out something with

improper behavior or improper usage?

CVS is not behaving as expected, and causing great difficulty. We have a baseline tag DEV and wish to add to it any files with a tag READY_FOR_DEV so we issue a command cvs checkout -r DEV -r READY_FOR_DEV module but we end up with only the stuff maerked READY_FOR_DEV What we get is only the

help on pserver connection

hello to all.. ... as of the moment i succesfully setup a winNT CVS server and its not that hard at all. workstations can login/logout checkin/checkout files but since we are switching all workstations to linux, i want to try it in linux. im having hard time seting up a CVS SERVER in a redhat9

Re: help on pserver connection

On Fri 10 Oct 03, 11:43 AM, kent emia [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: hello to all.. ... as of the moment i succesfully setup a winNT CVS server and its not that hard at all. workstations can login/logout checkin/checkout files but since we are switching all workstations to linux, i want to try it

RE: help on pserver connection

Hi! I think the thing you have done wrong is to not visit the latest of the CVS Cederqvist manual. It shows that after the RedHat 7 distribution the control for cvspserver had shifted to the xnetd services avialble as separate files under the /etc/xinetd.d directory. Here you create a file

RE: [cvsgui] Duplicating CVS repository from one server to another?

Title: Message Hi! You just need to copy the files with the existing permissions to the new server. Also, there is a GUI available with WinCVS, if that is what you are using which allows the client to change the 'root' on the local machines. (this is helpful if you have changed the name of

RE: [cvsgui] Any gui tools to show the branch structures?

Title: Message Hi! Well I think this is the most common question being asked by all and Oliver has answered it many a times. No as yet there is no such tool (although Oliver has made many attempts to create one.. ). The best you can do is go to the most used file (the one used by all or

Re: improper behavior or improper usage?

Mark Jaffe writes [in exceedingly long lines]: CVS is not behaving as expected, and causing great difficulty. Your expectations are wrong. The CVS philosophy is that you tag entire modules, not bits and pieces. -Larry Jones It's no fun to play games with a poor sport. -- Calvin

Re: help on pserver connection

On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 12:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri 10 Oct 03, 11:43 AM, kent emia [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: hello to all.. ... as of the moment i succesfully setup a winNT CVS server and its not that hard at all. workstations can login/logout checkin/checkout files but since we