Ick. I hate keyword expansions. The minute you ever merge
between branches you have to deal with those keywords.
donald
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 02:18:45PM +0100, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 04:53:33PM -0500, Robert Clark wrote:
If you are not too worried a
bryce_nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/spam.html writes:
/I'd like CVS to enforce treating these six files as one atomic/
/object, with a single revision history./
You could put them into an archive (eg tar) and check that in. Then
your build system would be in charge of unpacking
Larsson Mattias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are using the latest stable version of cvs here at work for out
developers but we have ran into trouble.
It seems some users can't access the cvs via pserver from
home either ISDN
or modem connecting to the corp lan.
Can you be more
Todd Denniston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim.Hyslop wrote:
echo ^RCS file:filerev
echo ^revision filerev
cvs log -rCURRENT_TAG | grep -f filerev
I think the above may give you some false positives, the
files in the Attic
(dead don't have the tag) lists all revs in the
Hi there!
We are using the latest stable version of cvs here at work for out
developers but we have ran into trouble.
It seems some users can't access the cvs via pserver from home either ISDN
or modem connecting to the corp lan.
From work it works like a charm, no problems at all but home
Jim.Hyslop wrote:
Katherine King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Now, having said all that, if they want to see if something's changed, they
can use the diff command:
cvs diff -rPREVIOUS_TAG -rCURRENT_TAG filename
If diff says nothing, then the file has not changed.
To get
Well cvs up -kk -j branch-tag-1 -j branch-tag-2 seems to work
okay for me to avoid problems with merging the keywords (I think we've
only used $Id$, though).
-- Jamie Wellnitz
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:05:49AM -0500, Donald Sharp wrote:
Ick. I hate keyword expansions. The minute you ever
Hi,
I am using WinCVS 1.3 along with PuTTY for authentication.
I have set up the public/private key pairs with PuTTYgen and
Pageant.
I can login to the system without providing password:
CVS login message from PuTTY==
login as: achen
Sent username achen
Authenticated using RSA key
While browsing one of our repositories, I came across a part of the tree that did not
belong where it was. It appeared as if one of the developers had done an import into
the tree from her work area (the top of the checkin was CVS_WORK which was a
locally-defined convention.) I noticed the file
Hi!
The repository files are marked according to the user who logins into
the CVS server for making commits. But before that the user has to
checkout the files in his/her name and then only can he check them in.
The other way for a user to do this is to use a script to change all his
local
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:19 pm, Mark Jaffe wrote:
How would it be possible for the files to be marked as owned by that user
if she did not check them in? Is it possible we cannot trust the CVS server
to write the files properly? It would not be prudent for another developer
to use someone else's
Krishna,
The error message indicates that your cvs client is configured to use rsh
instead of ssh. You will need to set the CVS_RSH environment variable to
point to the ssh client executable (i.e. set CVS_RSH=plink). You should use
plink instead of Putty (available from the same website) since
12 matches
Mail list logo