Re: Building CVS on Windows is broken...again

2004-02-15 Thread Derek Robert Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dennis Jones wrote: The latest version of CVS (1.11.13) fails to build on Windows...again. If you'd like to volunteer to set up nightly testing on Windows for the CVS tree... Building from the command line using NMAKE, results in the following

Re: how to automate the check out of a separate, related CVS tree?

2004-02-15 Thread Derek Robert Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary Funck wrote: Given the following directory structure: proj | |-- sub-proj1 | |-- sub-proj2 | |-- other files/dirs relating to proj Where 'proj' is an overall project directory accessed remotely as

Re: Building CVS on Windows is broken...again

2004-02-15 Thread Dennis Jones
- Original Message - From: Derek Robert Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dennis Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: CVS Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 11:03 AM Subject: Re: Building CVS on Windows is broken...again Dennis Jones wrote: The latest version of CVS

Re: Building CVS on Windows is broken...again

2004-02-15 Thread Derek Robert Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Larry Jones wrote: Derek Robert Price writes: Now, are you _sure_ there is no equivalent to fcntl() under Windows? I notice that both windows-nt/run.c and windows-nt/rcmd.c are including fcntl.h. Are you certain there isn't just some library we're

Re: Building CVS on Windows is broken...again

2004-02-15 Thread Derek Robert Price
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dennis Jones wrote: - Original Message - From: Derek Robert Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dennis Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: CVS Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 11:03 AM Subject: Re: Building CVS on Windows is

RE: Building CVS on Windows is broken...again

2004-02-15 Thread Conrad T. Pino
Hi Derek, From: Derek Robert Price I explaioned in another email to Larry. Still waiting to hear more opinions on the importance of the error check I restored. I general, the more error checks be better say I!!! Are you certain there isn't just some library we're neglecting to include