On Tuesday 20 January 2004 11:46 am, Andrew Marlow wrote:
Rhodes, Phillip C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am nervous that all my cvs archives are owned by a group that all of
our developers are a member of.
That is, any developer with a unix account (all of them) can nuke the
archives.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is that the cvs directory is on the same machine as all
the other server stuff including user's server home directories.
What you describe is a non-optimal setup. Do try to use a dedicated
machine which does
I'm somewhat new to CVS, and I have sort of a best-practices question.
I just checked out the Wine sources into ~/wine. To build them, I `cd`
into ~/wine and do a `./configure make make install`.
Is this for some reason a really bad idea? Is it harmless to build the
source inside my local
Build them right where they are now.
The sources you have now got locally, are _not_ the repository.
They are your private copy -often called a sandbox by CVS users.
Like a real sandbox, they are your spot for doing anything you like.
You can change them, without any risk for the real Wine