Gaurav,
CVSNT (also open source - also runs on Linux) solves this problem by using a separate
lock server.
You can download source and binaries for Linux here:
http://march-hare.com/cvspro
Regards,
Arthur Barrett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gaurav
Hi there,
I've just upgraded my version of WinCVS from v1.3.13.2 to v1.3.17.2
Our repository is stored on another server and is accessed directly accross
our LAN. Before the upgrade everything was working quite well, however now
it seems every time I try to perform any operation (update, commit,
Shamim,
WinCVS uses the CVSNT client by default. By upgrading WinCVS you have also upgraded
CVSNT.
I believe that you are using a CVSROOT like this (where h: is a network drive):
:local:h:\cvsrep\
Is this correct? If so then this is considered a non-optimal way to use the product.
We
hi all,
i'm using CVS for the first time. i'm using it as root on redhat 9.everything works fine, but when i try to commit changes i get a reply that root is not allowed to commitwhy is this so? another thingas a remedy to this, i tried to import a copy of the same project as a
I found a post in an archive regarding this issue which came quite close to
an answer, but not quite. I thought I would share my efforts in case it
saves someone some time. Here is the root of teh original thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2002-09/msg9.html
Environment:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm debugging my SSH/CVS connection so this
may be related.
I have a CVS server on a Linux (RH Fedora) and
client on HPUX 10.20. I have user1 set up on BOTH
machines with the same userid and groupid on BOTH
machines. I use SSH to tunnel through.
On the HPUX
Jim Page - emailsystems.com wrote:
I found a post in an archive regarding this issue which came quite close to
an answer, but not quite. I thought I would share my efforts in case it
saves someone some time. Here is the root of teh original thread:
Title: Blank
I have a bulk merging proces (also binary files)
Import a vendor version wich differs only for a few files from the
trunc.
Most files are like the trunc except the keywords expansions.
The problem is that the import notices conflicts, cause by only and only
the keywords.
Please Ignore I'm testing google groups 2
Jim.Hyslop wrote:
Sticks wrote:
we have a small php/mysql project and only two developers,
but we would
like to manage the project using cvs. we want to be able to
access the
repository managed by cvs through apache and we want to set up two
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Doug Lee wrote:
What has happened that is different that I don't understand how to
handle is the following. The open source project had to create a security
patch to the last production release. A branch was created off the last
release tag, and the changes for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is too bad you cannot specify an import with -b using a symbolic
branch tag. Semantically that seems consistent with the intent
of -b1.1.3, for example.
Huh? You CAN specify the '-b 1.1.3' value if
Title: Blank
All examples I have seen aremergingthe trunk with the
branch.
My question is howto update the branch with the trunk.
- I have a file a.txt revision 1.1
- I created a branch b which has as root a.txt revision 1.1
- for a.txt is a revision 1.2 created (the branch has still a.txt
Hi Todd
From: Todd Denniston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Huge suggestion:
Read the messages found here:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8q=cvs+network.file.system+site%3Alists.gnu.orgbtnG=Search
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:24:31AM +0200, Jim Page - emailsystems.com wrote:
From: Todd Denniston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Huge suggestion:
Read the messages found here:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8q=cvs+network.file.system+site%3Alists.gnu.orgbtnG=Search
14 matches
Mail list logo
