Hello,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 04:32:45PM -0600, jsWalter wrote:
But, I figure you can try and see if it works.
Any more specific details are welcome. I could test it even myself.
Best regards,
Spiro.
--
Spiro R. Trikaliotis
http://www.trikaliotis.net/
http://www.viceteam.org/
Hello Arno,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:26:37PM +0100, Arno Schuring wrote:
Regarding ssh for dos: there is no widely-used tcp/ip stack available
for DOS, so such network applications you are very unlikely to find.
I know of at least two native DOS TCP/IP stacks:
- The Microsoft TCP/IP
These make me ask more questions.
What is the default line ending character for ASCII files store in a
repository ?. Is this varies from OS to OS ?.
Does CVS client or server is supposed to perform the line ending
character conversion when a ASCII file is committed ?
Now the root cause of my
Hello Mark,
* On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 06:02:26PM -0800 Mark D. Baushke wrote:
SSHDOS has an SSH, SCP, SFTP and telnet client for DOS.
http://sshdos.sourceforge.net/
Ok, this sounds promising.
PuTTY is an SSH1+SSH2 implementation for Windows (not MS-DOS only).
Yes, I know.
CVS (from
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:40:05AM +0100, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
I want to run it on a machine which uses MS-DOS 6.22, nothing more. On
cvshome, I only found the Win32 versions. (Menu: ccvs/binaries/...),
nothing DOS only. I do not need a Win32 version, as I have a full cygwin
environment here
Hello,
* On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:22:16AM + Steve McIntyre wrote:
I would like to have a DOS only solution.
I've got to ask the question - why?
As I told before, I cannot compile this project on Win32, OS/2 or the
like. The compiler simply does not work, because its DOS extender does
Hi,
I had a wincvs version 1.2 and upgraded now to 1.3.20.2 Beta on a Win XP
machine.
Afterwards I wanted to configure some administration stuff and
didn't find admin/preferences/general (only Globals, CVS, Win CVS and
Command Dialogs are there).
What is the problem there? Is there any general
These make me ask more questions.
What is the default line ending character for ASCII files store in a
repository ?. Is this varies from OS to OS ?.
Does CVS client or server is supposed to perform the line ending
character conversion when a ASCII file is committed ?
RCS files have unix line
Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
Hello Arno,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:26:37PM +0100, Arno Schuring wrote:
SNIP
but you would still be stuck at the connectivity level - DOS has no
native networking support.
Yes, I know. That's the reason I mentioned ssh in the original post.
There is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Antony Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These make me ask more questions.
What is the default line ending character for ASCII files store in a
repository ?.
Files in the repository are in RCS format and are able to store both
ASCII and binary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sander wrote:
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Sander wrote:
It's true that add and commit hooks can enforce the same kinds of
policies
as post-conditions of the commit. However, add hooks can enforce
things
like naming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Conrad,
We had a discussion a little while back on info-cvs and the gist of
the discussion was that not everyone wants to see the binary
announcements. I created the [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
mailing list for this sort of thing.
Thanks,
Derek
Conrad
Derek Robert Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Neither of these worked. Does GSSAPI authentication simply
ignore the CVS passwd file?
Yes.
If so, is there some other method
I can use to obtain the desired user mapping?
Yeah, there is some funny Kerberos-specific code in server.c that
On Nov 18, 2004, at 7:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I still disagree, because some people like working from their laptop
and wireless network connections are hardly ubiquitous yet. Work that
a developer can do from their laptop off of the network can also
[ On Wednesday, November 17, 2004 at 09:19:18 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ]
Subject: Re: add hook question (was Re: Problem with importing third-party
sources and adding/committing changes)
It depends on the nature and extent of the changes. I can easily imagine
scenarios in which lost
[ On Wednesday, November 17, 2004 at 09:46:55 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Problem with importing third-party sources and adding/committing
changes
Paul you keep spreading myths and mistruths. I wish you'd stop.
This is simply not true, Greg, and you owe me a public apology.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg A. Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is no trigger for cvs rm and there MUST _NOT_ be.
There is no trigger for cvs add and there MUST _NOT_ be.
Please defend your position for 'MUST NOT' as it seems an entirely
reasonable suggestion that
[ On Thursday, November 18, 2004 at 10:38:44 (-0500), Derek Robert Price wrote:
]
Subject: Re: add hook question (was Re: Problem with importing third-party
sources and adding/committing changes)
Perhaps a -C option to `cvs add' similar to `cvs edit', where -C can
be placed in the user's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg A. Woods wrote:
There is no trigger for cvs rm and there MUST _NOT_ be.
There is no trigger for cvs add and there MUST _NOT_ be.
I have to admit, there is a certain logic to drawing the line at
triggers for repository changes, not workspace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg A. Woods wrote:
[ On Thursday, November 18, 2004 at 10:38:44 (-0500), Derek Robert
Price wrote: ]
Subject: Re: add hook question (was Re: Problem with importing
third-party sources and adding/committing changes)
Perhaps a -C option to `cvs
Me Too post
Derek Robert Price wrote:
Greg A. Woods wrote:
There is no trigger for cvs rm and there MUST _NOT_ be.
There is no trigger for cvs add and there MUST _NOT_ be.
I have to admit, there is a certain logic to drawing the line at
triggers for repository changes, not workspace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Greg,
Is it reasonable to suggest that a addinfo trigger could be run as a
part of the 'cvs commit' command should the client not happen to connect
to the server for a 'cvs add' operation?
The idea would be that having simpler triggers for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Denniston wrote:
I also still would not object to the a `cvs add -C' convenience hook
which requested that the client contact the server and validate the
add. Any team that valued this option significantly should find it
fairly easy to enforce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark D. Baushke wrote:
Hi Greg,
Is it reasonable to suggest that a addinfo trigger could be run as a
part of the 'cvs commit' command should the client not happen to connect
to the server for a 'cvs add' operation?
It should probably run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derek Robert Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark D. Baushke wrote:
Hi Greg,
Is it reasonable to suggest that a addinfo trigger could be run as a
part of the 'cvs commit' command should the client not happen to connect
to the server for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark D. Baushke wrote:
For that matter, I would like to see disconnected 'cvs diff' commands
where possible for users that already have a CVS/Base/* version of the
file around...
Yep. I'm actually tempted to have the CVS client always create
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ On Wednesday, November 17, 2004 at 09:19:18 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ]
Subject: Re: add hook question (was Re: Problem with importing third-party
sources and adding/committing changes)
It depends on the nature and extent of the changes. I can
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ On Wednesday, November 17, 2004 at 09:46:55 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Problem with importing third-party sources and
adding/committing changes
Paul you keep spreading myths and mistruths. I wish you'd stop.
This is simply not
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ On Thursday, November 18, 2004 at 10:38:44 (-0500), Derek Robert Price
wrote: ]
Subject: Re: add hook question (was Re: Problem with importing third-party
sources and adding/committing changes)
Perhaps a -C option to `cvs add' similar to `cvs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We've already discussed how to add such a capability in such a way that
it involves zero overhead for those who don't want it: Register no
triggers and defer their enforcement until commit time. But for
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg A. Woods wrote:
There is no trigger for cvs rm and there MUST _NOT_ be.
There is no trigger for cvs add and there MUST _NOT_ be.
I have to admit, there is a certain logic to drawing the line at
triggers for repository changes, not workspace
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Derek Robert Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mark D. Baushke wrote:
Hi Greg,
Is it reasonable to suggest that a addinfo trigger could be run as a
part of the 'cvs commit' command should the client not happen to connect
to the server for a
I noticed you couldn't set ssh anymore as your transport there. The
new wincvs has an ssh dll built in I believe. Maybe the old one did
too but I didn't notice because I always used ext and ssh as my
transport instead of the builtin one.
You might see some of the options you are missing if you
When I try to use the built in ssh in the 1.3.20.2 Beta release of
wincvs instead of using an ext ssh it works on some machines and not
on others set up with the exact same version. I get the following
message when I try to check out a module:
cvs -d
jsWalter wrote:
I have complete details on how to use CVS and SSH from the command
line.
OK, I should not have said complete :/
snip
Don't leave us in suspense! We want details! :^)
Don't let the path definitions below throw you. This *is* on a Windows box
(XP and 2k3 server infact)
I
Craig,
WinCVS uses CVSNT for it's communications by default (unless you've
explicitly changed it).
The correct forum for CVSNT questions is here:
http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
or
news://news.cvsnt.org/support.cvsnt
Regards,
Arthur Barrett
-Original Message-
Hello,
* On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:10:47AM -0600 jsWalter wrote:
Don't let the path definitions below throw you. This *is* on a Windows
box (XP and 2k3 server infact)
Well, the OP (from me) clearly stated DOS. That is, MS-DOS x.yy. I do
not understand what your posting has to do with this?
Hello Todd,
* On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:17:08AM -0500 Todd Denniston wrote:
sneakernet.
Yes, I fear it's the way I have to go. ;-(
Anyway, in my environment, I mostly use a DOS-Box inside of VMWare, so
using physical media would not be that reasonable, would it? I rarely go
to a real DOS
38 matches
Mail list logo
