Can I allow user to only have permission in branches but not HEAD?

Hi, I have a question about how access permissions on branches and HEAD. I want to restrict certain CVS users to only be able to commit their changes to branches but not the HEAD. Yet at the same time, I want to allow them to check out modules from the HEAD. Is this doable? Thanks! David Jiao

RE: Can I allow user to only have permission in branches but not HEAD?

The script cvs_acls in the contrib directory of a CVS download from cvshome.org will do this for you. ~Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jiao Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 9:24 AM To: info-cvs@gnu.org Subject: Can I

Problem with cvs log -d

I'm running cvs version 1.11.17 on a Sun E250 Solaris 9 and can't seem to get logs by date working. $ cvs --version Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.17 (client/server) If I issue the comand $ cvs log -d =20041120 I am returned with log information for all files in the directory. Here is

Re: Problem with cvs log -d

Scott Watters writes: $ cvs log -d =20041120 I am returned with log information for all files in the directory. Correct. The -d option only affects which log messages get displayed, you still get headers for all the files. If you don't want the extra headers, you need the -S option, too.

Re: Problem with cvs log -d

DOH!! I've been staring at the mole book and man page for hours. I have no idea how I glossed over that option. Sorry for the waste of bandwidth. Scott On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 17:05 -0500, Larry Jones wrote: Scott Watters writes: $ cvs log -d =20041120 I am returned with log

Re: [Fwd: Q on keyword substitution]

jsWalter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's -kv, not '-ko'. '-kv' removes the keyword (and the bracketing $$) and leaves only the value. OK, but doesn't this strip ALL the keywords? Yes. It's all or nothing. and you have to be *very* careful with the spelling of '$Revision: $' when you