Can WinCVS be made to use ssh to authenticate?
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
NO, how do I get cvs to use something other than rsh?
James Knowles wrote:
Is there anyont to get cvs to run a
different (more secure) command?
We use ssh exclusively,
How?
We're not using the CVS pserver. I've used ssh tunneling (port proxy) for
other applications, but not for
Hey thanks. That actualyl worked.
Any idea how to make WinCVS do likewise?
Gianni Mariani wrote:
bash:
export CVS_RSH=ssh
tcsh
setenv CVS_RSH ssh
Bryon Lape wrote:
NO, how do I get cvs to use something other than rsh?
James Knowles wrote:
Is there anyont to get cvs to run
How?
James Knowles wrote:
Is there anyont to get cvs to run a
different (more secure) command?
We use ssh exclusively, including in-house. No machine has rsh or any of the
other r* commands installed. You may use asymmetric cryptographic keys to
enable passwordless logins.
Larry Jones wrote:
Bryon Lape writes:
When I put xinetd in debug mode, it sees the file and does not complain,
but connections to the box from another never get anywhere. CVS works
fine if the user is on the machine. What gives?
Exactly what error do you get? The most likely
I did a cvs -t and see that it is trying to run rsh on the machine in
question. This has been disabled. Is there anyont to get cvs to run a
different (more secure) command?
Larry Jones wrote:
Bryon Lape writes:
When I put xinetd in debug mode, it sees the file and does not complain
I am trying to use cvs on a machine with RH 7.2. Since the non-secure
ports are disabled, I am having problem connecting. I have a cvspserver
file as follows:
service cvspserver
{
socket_type = stream
protocol= tcp
wait=
Is it possible to have cvs (or WinCVS) hit a server over an ssh
connection?
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
I have a script that gets executed when a user checks in a file that
updates the file under the web area. This lets developers keep their
copies separate from the web area. It works great if the user is the
file owner, but if they are not, things go into CVS ok, but issuing the
update command
By hand. It is a real bummer.
Dave Smith wrote:
so, how do I create that modules file? are there special things I should
place in it?
the modules file I have on the server has each module listed twice .. If I
remove one of the listings CVS gives me errors when I run 'cvs co -c'
Dave
Ah, the typical Unix answer"roll your own"...
Gianni Mariani wrote:
You
can "share" dircetories.So
if all the bits you care about are in a directory, you're all set, you
just need to provide a script for
your folk to check out the sources. The script is simply multiple
"cvs co" commands
How does one use the reserved locks?
Jerzy Kaczorowski wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's Noel Yap's patches on SourceForge, which apply to a down-rev
release
of CVS. I believe that others have implemented it as well, but only
privately
Though I had to tell patch where each file was by hand and I had to go
back 2 versions on cvs, I think I know have Yap's reserved locks. But
how does one use them?
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
CVS doesn't require hand merging. When you perform a cvs update
operation, then new changes in the repository are automatically
incorporated into your working copy. Only when a conflict arises do
you have to do resolution by hand. Conflicts tend to occur rarely, and
are
Freedom? What freedom? Is it not source control or is it source freedom?
One is free to more easily and quickly lay waste to another's work, but that's
hardly an improvement.
CVS smells just like what it is, an acedemic exercize. I've used all manner of
them over the years: PostgreSQL,
James Knowles wrote:
now if I can just add locking to CVS
Try understanding client-oriented parallel development. It will cause less
heartburn, reduce your stress, and reduce the rate of hair loss.
None of these problems I have. I just don't have time to spend days on a
worthless
Netscape tries and tries, but nothing is ever returned by this link.
Paul Sander wrote:
Ich funde es bei http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=422733group_id=4680atid=304680
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Wo? Ich kann nicht es gefunden.
>Paul Sander wrote:
>>
Wrong.
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to ask yourself why your group is experiencing so many conflicts
while so many other groups (thousands?) are not.
Because there is no group, and there are no conflicts. This is just
another
I simply clicked on the link you supplied. I even copied it to IE
just to make sure Nutscraper wasn't having a problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to use Netscape get to the patches.
Exactly what are you doing?
Noel
Netscape tries and tries, but nothing is ever returned by this link.
Yeah, file locking is really unproductive. I just love wasting all that time
tryin' to figure out why the merge didn't happen and do it all by hand. My boss
really likes all the extra cost too.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most you could hope for in CVS is to install a patch that allows
The RCVS part on source forge seems to be dead. Is anyone really developing
locking for CVS?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most you could hope for in CVS is to install a patch that allows
advisory locks -- reserved locks are counter to the purpose of CVS. You
can find a version of the patch
Paul Sander wrote:
If your question really is: Is anyone modifying CVS to support locking?
Then I believe the answer is yes.
Who? And where may I get it?
If your question really is: Is anyone making locking a mainstream feature
of CVS? Then I believe the answer is no.
shame
No link to any files produces anything. One cannot download a patch that is not
there.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patches are there for anyone to use. Last I heard, all that's stopping
them from being included with the standard distribution are the lack of
test and doc patches. You're
Sure, if you have the link already.
This one produces nothing:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=4680
This one produces cvs commands that do not work (no log in allowed):
http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=4680
The ftp link is to a directory that does not exist.
I stand by
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 11/10/2001 at 23:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read Berliner's whole paper. Understand what it means to force
developers to use a parallel development paradigm and learn what the
benefits are.
I understand it, there aren't any.
Wo? Ich kann nicht es gefunden.
Paul Sander wrote:
There's Noel Yap's patches on SourceForge, which apply to a down-rev release
of CVS. I believe that others have implemented it as well, but only privately
in their own shops. Maybe they don't advertise them for fear of being blasted
by
Greg A. Woods wrote:
Read Berliner's whole paper. Understand what it means to force
developers to use a parallel development paradigm and learn what the
benefits are.
The benefits add up to zero. Now, if it did method locking, that would be helpful,
protective AND productive. Without some
Larry Jones wrote:
Bryon Lape writes:
User joe checkouts files to his local devel area. User joe is done and
checks files back in. CVS updates its database and then copies the
updated files to the shared development area.
http://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/cvs_18.html#SEC171
After MUCH trial and error, I got it to work, but errors do not display in the
log file.
Bryon Lape wrote:
Larry Jones wrote:
Bryon Lape writes:
User joe checkouts files to his local devel area. User joe is done and
checks files back in. CVS updates its database and then copies
When a Linux user goes a checkout of a module, all the files are
writeable and they stay that way even after a commit. When a Windows
user, however, does a checkout via WinCVS, all the files are read-only.
Is there a way to make them writeable via WinCVS? Also, when the files
are comitted, they
This only works on the first checkout. In a sane and normal source control
system, files stay read only until you check them out. CVS seems to be
neither and lets people change files at will. This is quite bad and counter
productive.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When a Linux user goes a
I was wondering if I can do the following in CVS and if so, how:
User joe checkouts files to his local devel area. User joe is done and
checks files back in. CVS updates its database and then copies the
updated files to the shared development area.
32 matches
Mail list logo
