Activity-based CVS shell website

months (that's more or less the timeframe we want to roll this out) working on this code. So if you just want to see the end result you can expect to stay in lurk mode until July ;-) Regards, Cees -- Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B

Re: Moving repository: best way to handle this?

Dominique de Waleffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 1) write a script which fixes all the refs to the old repository in the Repository files (plus fix their CVSROOT)? That usually turns out to be the best way. -- Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG 1024D

Re: Activity-based CVS shell

for the positive reactions, hope they'll stay that way after you've taken a look at what's there ;-) Regards, Cees -- Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B Forge your CipherSaber and list it: http

Activity-based CVS shell

help me if there would be lots of interest to actually use this stuff in the CVS community. Would people consider/like to/love to switch to a more process-based shell around CVS? Or is the general feeling that this sort of stuff ain't necessary? -- Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com

Tracking other repositories

t my ideas here, but I really don't like what I've written up so far about it). Are more people in this situation, and if yes: are there workable solutions? -- Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F