Title: RE: Terminated with fatal signal 11
I had this happen if I was asking CVS to use the UNIX passwords, but I didn't specify the username in CVS's passwd file.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien GEINDRE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2002 8:34 AM
> To:
Title: RE: Soft link in CVS
Once again in plain ASCII...
-Original Message-
From: Kostur, Andre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 7:48 AM
To: 'Eli Eaton'; CVS newsgroup (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Soft link in CVS
CVS and Soft Links do not play wel
Title: RE: Soft link in CVS
CVS and Soft Links do not play well together. In particular, they don't exist on some platforms on which CVS runs (how do you do a proper soft-link under Win32?) (there are other reasons, ask Mr. Woods). That sort of thing is probably best done with either post-up
Title: RE: Edit, Editors, and Branches
Aaaaugh!!! Freaking Outlook!!! Let's try this again in PLAIN TEXT. (as I grumble about Outlook)
-Original Message-
From: Kostur, Andre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2001 12:58 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Title: Edit, Editors, and Branches
I seem to have encountered an oddity in CVS and I'm not sure whether this was an oversight on the part of CVS, or me :) ?
Let's assume that you have a file foo.c, with a branch of Branch1.
Now, say that a user has foo.c checked out in their workspace on Br
Title: RE: Checkout text files with the Unix LF (Oxa) - from command line
> RE: Checkout text files with the Unix LF (Oxa) - from command
> line(...)
> >> empty. What to do to run that option (Unix LF) when I use cvs
> >> from command
> >> line in Windows.
> (...)
> >I'm probably going to reg
Title: RE: Checkout text files with the Unix LF (Oxa) - from command line
I'm probably going to regret asking, but why would you want to not use the host EOL character? Reminder that sharing a local workspace between two computers isn't a recommended idea
> -Original Message-
>
Title: RE: Possible to use PAM as authentication on linux?
There's also a patch floating around which will allow the pserver method to use PAM to resolve the password.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:3
Title: cvs update with a tag
There seems to be an oddity when updating with a tag (in my case, branch). Let's presume that I have a directory of 40 files, only 5 of which are on a branch. If I do:
cvs update -f -r Branch
to update all files from the repository, the 5 on the branch being a
Well,
I guess the answer is maybe. If you have the history file being used on
your repository, you could probably look through that to see who's checked out a
file. But then again, checking out a file doesn't mean anything.
They may have checked out a file, and then deleted it localally,
You can do a search on Google for "CVS PAM patch". Comes up with lots of
references... the first one being:
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-cvs/2000-June/001264.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Maarten de Boer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:42 AM
> To:
Before Mr. Woods jumps all over you (hopefully)... CVS itself doesn't do a
whole lot of authentication (in pserver mode. In the other modes, it relies
on whatever account you logged into). At best it can look into your
system's passwd file. However all hope is not lost. If you are using
local
> -Original Message-
> From: Thornley, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:28 AM
> To: CVS-II Discussion Mailing List (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Future CVS Development
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From:
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel L Yap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Future CVS Development
>
>
> CVS only requires files to be mergable. This has a different
> meaning from
> requiring
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 5:32 PM
> To: Kostur, Andre
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Future CVS Development
>
>
> [ On Monday, June 18, 2001 at 14:39:53 (-0700), Kostur, And
> -Original Message-
> From: Pascal Bourguignon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Future CVS Development
> > From: "Kostur, Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel L Yap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 8:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Future CVS Development
>
>
>
> >4) And I know this is going to be a contentious point: the
> _option_ of
> >exclusive
I see many suggesting floating around on what should be added to CVS (where
everybody seems to have a different idea of what "should" is). However, I
don't recall seeing a roadmap to what is _going to be_ added to CVS. There
are a few design decisions that I'd like to know more about, personally
I'm having a difficulty trying to figure out how to layout the modules file
to do the following. Let's assume the repository looks like:
/dir1
/dir1/dir2
/dir1/dir2/file1.cpp
/dir1/dir2/file1.h
/shared
/shared/sdir1
/shared/sdir1/sfile1.cpp
I want my local workspace to look like:
/dir1
/dir1/
If you're compiling the files on a Linux box, why aren't you doing the
checkout on the Linux box?
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Aronsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows->Linux question.
Hi !
I have cvs running o
Re-add the file and CVS will tell you it's resurrecting the file. See
section 7.2 in the Cederqvist manual.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Knight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 7:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: un-removing a file
hello,
I have accidently
That file has been updated by Patch (and not a full file-copy)
See Appendix A.16.2 in the Cederqvist manual.
-Original Message-
From: Nelson, Vicki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2001 4:51 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: cvs update question
I searched the CVS book
Let's see, other major projects using CVS
KDE?
Mozilla?
anything on SourceForge.net?
come to think of it, I think _Sourceforge.net_ itself is in CVS?
We actually looked at a few source code control tools, and we couldn't
justify the astronomical costs of ClearCase. If CVS wasn't our choice,
external documentation, or something like cvsweb)
-Original Message-
From: Karl-Heinz Marbaise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2001 12:39 AM
To: Kostur, Andre
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Browsing the repository
Hi there,
Did you ever think about t
Well, that depends on what you want to consider "no log message". I've got
some scripts that will reject commits if there isn't at least one non-empty
line. If you're interested (or anybody else), I can make them available, or
email them to you. But as a hint, what you're looking for is to chan
Something that seems to be missing from cvs is a mechanism by which a user
can browse the repository. I'm not talking about CVSWeb or something like
that, those are cheating and assuming that there is a web server available
on the repository machine. I'm talking about running something like "cvs
You can also do "cvs -n -q update", if you just want the list of files that
will be touched (you won't see the actual changes)
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Riechers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 4, 2001 9:55 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Comparing first; checki
Are you using WinCVS? If so, ours was crashing too because the username
that we were using wasn't listed in the CVSROOT/passwd file (and we are
allowing the system to fall-back to system authentication).
BTW: If nobody else is using cvs, then you can remove the lock files.
-Original Message
Right now, CVS looks in ~/.cvsrc for a default configuration file. Would it
be useful if CVS also looked in some systemwide location for a .cvsrc file
too (much like bash does /etc/profile, then ~/.profile) ?
Kostur, Andre.vcf
29 matches
Mail list logo