bug-cvs mailing list: is it dead?

2004-01-30 Thread Phil Richards
Probably the wrong place to post, but I've been trying to volunteer to do some CVS development by posting a summary of what I was thinking of doing to bug-cvs - nothing has come through. In fact, nothing has come through bug-cvs since 2003-12-30. Is the bug-cvs mailing list dead? If so, should I

Re: bug-cvs mailing list: is it dead?

2004-02-01 Thread Phil Richards
On 2004-01-31, Ed Avis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phil Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Is the bug-cvs mailing list dead? > <http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.bugs> > shows it to be alive and well. Alive on gmane, perhaps - all

Re: bug-cvs mailing list: is it dead?

2004-02-05 Thread Phil Richards
On 2004-02-02, Ed Avis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm so does this mean a mailing list can have an undead existence on > Gmane after the list server has stopped working? So articles posted > on Gmane go directly into the group, they don't have to make a round > trip via the mailing list. Yu

Re: CVS Pros/Cons

2004-02-13 Thread Phil Richards
On 2004-02-13, Kevin Layer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Larry Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It actually wouldn't be difficult, but it would be a lot of tedious work > >> for very little benefit -- lack of atomicity usually isn't a problem and > >> when it is, it is almost always easily fix