Re: cvs import -R -f

2000-10-23 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Larry" == Larry Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Today I discovered that "cvs import -R -f" is not the same as >> "cvs import -f -R". The latter is recursive while the former is not. >> This suprised me. I think the two should be equivalent. Larry> import doesn't have a -f flag. Ye

cvs import -R -f

2000-10-23 Thread Tom Tromey
Today I discovered that "cvs import -R -f" is not the same as "cvs import -f -R". The latter is recursive while the former is not. This suprised me. I think the two should be equivalent. Tom ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu

RE: Java class and jar files

2000-07-17 Thread Tom Tromey
Eric> Is there a *Java-related* reason not to put .class and .jar Eric> files up in CVS? The benefits of putting .class files into CVS are dubious. Since CVS doesn't preserve relative timestamps on files, you can't reliably use this as a way to check in precompiled files. The timestamps might be

Re: Tracking other repositories

2000-05-24 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Cees" == Cees de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Cees> I've tried a couple of approaches, but none are really Cees> satisfactory (I can post my ideas here, but I really don't like Cees> what I've written up so far about it). Are more people in this Cees> situation, and if yes: are there

Re: bug in import?

2000-05-09 Thread Tom Tromey
Michael> There appears to be a bug in import. It looks as though a Michael> second import that does NOT have a file that was present in Michael> the first import will not result in that file being dead. This is a known limitation of cvs import. Tom